Background: This study investigated whether the effectiveness of first-line tyrosine-kinase inhibitors was associated with sites of disease in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods: A retrospective cohort of consecutive mRCC patients receiving first-line sorafenib (SO) or sunitinib (SU) was analyzed. Results: In total, 203 patients received SO and 99 SU. In patients with liver metastasis, SU was associated with a 18% higher risk of time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and a 39% higher risk of death than SO: conversely, patients without liver metastases who received SU showed a 46% decreased risk of TTF and 62% decreased risk of death. Conclusions: mRCC patients with liver metastases treated with first-line SO showed a better outcome compared with SU, while mRCC patients without liver metastases treated with firstline SU showed a better outcome compared with SO.
Sites of disease as predictors of outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with first-line sunitinib or sorafenib / P. Grassi, E. Verzoni, L. Porcu, R. Iacovelli, F. De Braud, G. Procopio. - In: THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY. - ISSN 1756-2872. - 7:2(2015 Apr), pp. 59-68. [10.1177/1756287215571809]
Sites of disease as predictors of outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with first-line sunitinib or sorafenib
E. VerzoniSecondo
;F. De BraudPenultimo
;
2015
Abstract
Background: This study investigated whether the effectiveness of first-line tyrosine-kinase inhibitors was associated with sites of disease in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods: A retrospective cohort of consecutive mRCC patients receiving first-line sorafenib (SO) or sunitinib (SU) was analyzed. Results: In total, 203 patients received SO and 99 SU. In patients with liver metastasis, SU was associated with a 18% higher risk of time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and a 39% higher risk of death than SO: conversely, patients without liver metastases who received SU showed a 46% decreased risk of TTF and 62% decreased risk of death. Conclusions: mRCC patients with liver metastases treated with first-line SO showed a better outcome compared with SU, while mRCC patients without liver metastases treated with firstline SU showed a better outcome compared with SO.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
10.1177_1756287215571809.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
979.94 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
979.94 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.