Purpose: To investigate dose distribution variations due to setup errors and range uncertainties in image-guided carbon ion radiotherapy of head chordoma. Materials and methods: Ten treatment plans were retrospectively tested with TRiP98 against ±1.0 mm and ±1.0° setup errors, as observed in clinical routine, and 2.6% range uncertainty when 2 mm CTV-to-PTV margins were applied. Single-fraction simulations were compared with the total treatment dose in terms of DVH bands, conformity and inhomogeneity. The contribution of image processing artifacts on reported results was also discussed, as a function of the imaging dataset resolution. Results: Results showed that safety margins grant the conformal target coverage in presence of setup errors with D95CTV variations below 10% in 7 patients out of 10. Instead, the inclusion of range uncertainty yielded to appreciable dose degradation, reporting larger effects for CTV and dose conformity, whereas reduced impact is found on the organ-at-risk. The fractionation scheme positively affects dose conformity and inhomogeneity; conversely its influence on DVH bands is strongly related to the patient anatomy. Conclusion: Besides safety margins, setup and range uncertainties lead to non-negligible combined contribution. Systematical treatment plan robustness assessment against expected uncertainties is thus encouraged, selecting beam settings and fractionation schemes where homogeneity is preserved.

Dosimetric effects of residual uncertainties in carbon ion treatment of head chordoma / G. Fattori, M. Riboldi, E. Scifoni, M. Krämer, A. Pella, M. Durante, S. Ronchi, M. Bonora, R. Orecchia, G. Baroni. - In: RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0167-8140. - 113:1(2014 Oct), pp. 66-71. [10.1016/j.radonc.2014.08.001]

Dosimetric effects of residual uncertainties in carbon ion treatment of head chordoma

S. Ronchi;M. Bonora;R. Orecchia
Penultimo
;
2014

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate dose distribution variations due to setup errors and range uncertainties in image-guided carbon ion radiotherapy of head chordoma. Materials and methods: Ten treatment plans were retrospectively tested with TRiP98 against ±1.0 mm and ±1.0° setup errors, as observed in clinical routine, and 2.6% range uncertainty when 2 mm CTV-to-PTV margins were applied. Single-fraction simulations were compared with the total treatment dose in terms of DVH bands, conformity and inhomogeneity. The contribution of image processing artifacts on reported results was also discussed, as a function of the imaging dataset resolution. Results: Results showed that safety margins grant the conformal target coverage in presence of setup errors with D95CTV variations below 10% in 7 patients out of 10. Instead, the inclusion of range uncertainty yielded to appreciable dose degradation, reporting larger effects for CTV and dose conformity, whereas reduced impact is found on the organ-at-risk. The fractionation scheme positively affects dose conformity and inhomogeneity; conversely its influence on DVH bands is strongly related to the patient anatomy. Conclusion: Besides safety margins, setup and range uncertainties lead to non-negligible combined contribution. Systematical treatment plan robustness assessment against expected uncertainties is thus encouraged, selecting beam settings and fractionation schemes where homogeneity is preserved.
carbon ion radiotherapy; image-guided patient positioning; range uncertainties; setup errors; treatment planning; chordoma; head and neck neoplasms; heavy ion radiotherapy; humans; male; neoplasm, residual; radiometry; radiotherapy dosage; radiotherapy planning, computer-assisted; radiotherapy, image-guided; retrospective studies; uncertainty; radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging; oncology; hematology
Settore MED/36 - Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia
ott-2014
21-ago-2014
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/425434
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact