The essay analyses the sentence actio aquae pluviae arcendae non in rem sed personalis est contained in a text by Ulpian belonging to titolo 39.3 of the Digest. The wording, for which the essay evaluates also the interpolation doubts, is analysed under two points of view: the one referring to real cases, with a focus to real situations described by the jurist and the palingenetic one, useful to better understand the logic steps leading to the definition of the personal characteristic of the action. The essay then moves on to a quick overview on the so called obligation propter rem in the context of the present Italian law. The essay terminates with a further reference to the past, that is the reconstruction by Pothier, in equilibrium between the principes of [personalità] and [ambulatorietà] of the action. Finally the essay confirms the idea according to which the concepts belonging to the juridic disciplines can not always be valid regardless of times and places.
Analisi dell'actio aquae pluviae arcendae in una testimonianza ulpianea e considerazioni sulla cosiddetta obbligazione ambulatoria nel diritto attuale.
Actio aquae pluviae arcendae non in rem sed personalis est / F. Pulitano'. - In: IUS ROMANUM. - ISSN 2367-7007. - 2015:2(2015), pp. 1-26.
Actio aquae pluviae arcendae non in rem sed personalis est
F. Pulitano'
2015
Abstract
The essay analyses the sentence actio aquae pluviae arcendae non in rem sed personalis est contained in a text by Ulpian belonging to titolo 39.3 of the Digest. The wording, for which the essay evaluates also the interpolation doubts, is analysed under two points of view: the one referring to real cases, with a focus to real situations described by the jurist and the palingenetic one, useful to better understand the logic steps leading to the definition of the personal characteristic of the action. The essay then moves on to a quick overview on the so called obligation propter rem in the context of the present Italian law. The essay terminates with a further reference to the past, that is the reconstruction by Pothier, in equilibrium between the principes of [personalità] and [ambulatorietà] of the action. Finally the essay confirms the idea according to which the concepts belonging to the juridic disciplines can not always be valid regardless of times and places.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Готова Франческа Пулитано (1).pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
473.13 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
473.13 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.