Background Half the epidemiological studies with information about menopausal hormone therapy and ovarian cancer risk remain unpublished, and some retrospective studies could have been biased by selective participation or recall. We aimed to assess with minimal bias the effects of hormone therapy on ovarian cancer risk. Methods Individual participant datasets from 52 epidemiological studies were analysed centrally. The principal analyses involved the prospective studies (with last hormone therapy use extrapolated forwards for up to 4 years). Sensitivity analyses included the retrospective studies. Adjusted Poisson regressions yielded relative risks (RRs) versus never-use. Findings During prospective follow-up, 12 110 postmenopausal women, 55% (6601) of whom had used hormone therapy, developed ovarian cancer. Among women last recorded as current users, risk was increased even with <5 years of use (RR 1·43, 95% CI 1·31-1·56; p<0·0001). Combining current-or-recent use (any duration, but stopped <5 years before diagnosis) resulted in an RR of 1·37 (95% CI 1·29-1·46; p<0·0001); this risk was similar in European and American prospective studies and for oestrogen-only and oestrogen-progestagen preparations, but differed across the four main tumour types (heterogeneity p<0·0001), being definitely increased only for the two most common types, serous (RR 1·53, 95% CI 1·40-1·66; p<0·0001) and endometrioid (1·42, 1·20-1·67; p<0·0001). Risk declined the longer ago use had ceased, although about 10 years after stopping long-duration hormone therapy use there was still an excess of serous or endometrioid tumours (RR 1·25, 95% CI 1·07-1·46, p=0·005). Interpretation The increased risk may well be largely or wholly causal; if it is, women who use hormone therapy for 5 years from around age 50 years have about one extra ovarian cancer per 1000 users and, if its prognosis is typical, about one extra ovarian cancer death per 1700 users.

Menopausal hormone use and ovarian cancer risk : Individual participant meta-analysis of 52 epidemiological studies / S.M. Gapstur, A.V. Patel, E. Banks, L. Dal Maso, R. Talamini, A. Chetrit, G. Hirsh Yechezkel, F. Lubin, S. Sadetzki, V. Beral, D. Bull, B. Cairns, B. Crossley, K. Gaitskell, A. Goodill, J. Green, C. Hermon, T. Key, K. Moser, G. Reeves, F. Sitas, R. Collins, R. Peto, C.A. Gonzalez, N. Lee, P. Marchbanks, H.W. Ory, H.B. Peterson, P.A. Wingo, N. Martin, S. Silpisornkosol, C. Theetranont, B. Boosiri, S. Chutivongse, P. Jimakorn, P. Virutamasen, C. Wongsrichanalai, M.T. Goodman, O. Lidegaard, S.K. Kjaer, L.S. Morch, S.K. Kjaer, A. Tjonneland, T. Byers, T. Rohan, B. Mosgaard, M. Vessey, D. Yeates, J.L. Freudenheim, L.J. Titus, J. Chang Claude, R. Kaaks, K.E. Anderson, D. Lazovich, K. Robien, J. Hampton, P.A. Newcomb, M.A. Rossing, D.B. Thomas, N.S. Weiss, E. Lokkegaard, E. Riboli, F. Clavel Chapelon, D. Cramer, S.E. Hankinson, R.M. Tamimi, S.S. Tworoger, S. Franceschi, C. La Vecchia, E. Negri, H.O. Adami, C. Magnusson, T. Riman, E. Weiderpass, A. Wolk, L.J. Schouten, P.A. van den Brandt, N. Chantarakul, S. Koetsawang, D. Rachawat, D. Palli, A. Black, L.A. Brinton, D.M. Freedman, P. Hartge, A.W. Hsing, J.V.L. Jnr, J. Lissowska, R.N. Hoover, C. Schairer, C. Babb, M. Urban, S. Graff Iversen, R. Selmer, C.J. Bain, A.C. Green, D.M. Purdie, V. Siskind, P.M. Webb, K. Moysich, S.E. Mccann, P. Hannaford, C. Kay, C.W. Binns, A.H. Lee, M. Zhang, R.B. Ness, P. Nasca, P.F. Coogan, J.R. Palmer, L. Rosenberg, A. Whittemore, K. Katsouyanni, A. Trichopoulou, D. Trichopoulos, A. Tzonou, A. Dabancens, L. Martinez, R. Molina, O. Salas, G. Lurie, M.E. Carney, L.R. Wilkens, L. Hartman, J. Manjer, H. Olsson, M. Kumle, J.A. Grisso, M. Morgan, J.E. Wheeler, R.P. Edwards, J.L. Kelley, F. Modugno, N.C. Onland Moret, P.H.M. Peeters, J. Casagrande, M.C. Pike, A.H. Wu, K. Canfell, A.B. Miller, I.T. Gram, E. Lund, L. Mcgowan, X.O. Shu, W. Zheng, T.M.M. Farley, S. Holck, O. Meirik, H.A. Risch. - In: THE LANCET. - ISSN 0140-6736. - 385:9980(2015), pp. 1835-1842. [10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61687-1]

Menopausal hormone use and ovarian cancer risk : Individual participant meta-analysis of 52 epidemiological studies

C. La Vecchia;E. Negri;
2015

Abstract

Background Half the epidemiological studies with information about menopausal hormone therapy and ovarian cancer risk remain unpublished, and some retrospective studies could have been biased by selective participation or recall. We aimed to assess with minimal bias the effects of hormone therapy on ovarian cancer risk. Methods Individual participant datasets from 52 epidemiological studies were analysed centrally. The principal analyses involved the prospective studies (with last hormone therapy use extrapolated forwards for up to 4 years). Sensitivity analyses included the retrospective studies. Adjusted Poisson regressions yielded relative risks (RRs) versus never-use. Findings During prospective follow-up, 12 110 postmenopausal women, 55% (6601) of whom had used hormone therapy, developed ovarian cancer. Among women last recorded as current users, risk was increased even with <5 years of use (RR 1·43, 95% CI 1·31-1·56; p<0·0001). Combining current-or-recent use (any duration, but stopped <5 years before diagnosis) resulted in an RR of 1·37 (95% CI 1·29-1·46; p<0·0001); this risk was similar in European and American prospective studies and for oestrogen-only and oestrogen-progestagen preparations, but differed across the four main tumour types (heterogeneity p<0·0001), being definitely increased only for the two most common types, serous (RR 1·53, 95% CI 1·40-1·66; p<0·0001) and endometrioid (1·42, 1·20-1·67; p<0·0001). Risk declined the longer ago use had ceased, although about 10 years after stopping long-duration hormone therapy use there was still an excess of serous or endometrioid tumours (RR 1·25, 95% CI 1·07-1·46, p=0·005). Interpretation The increased risk may well be largely or wholly causal; if it is, women who use hormone therapy for 5 years from around age 50 years have about one extra ovarian cancer per 1000 users and, if its prognosis is typical, about one extra ovarian cancer death per 1700 users.
drug administration schedule; estrogen replacement therapy; female; humans; incidence; middle aged; ovarian neoplasms; postmenopause; risk assessment; medicine (all)
Settore MED/01 - Statistica Medica
2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Menopausal-hormones-LANCET-15-NOIST.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 460.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
460.61 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/375363
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 108
  • Scopus 299
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 219
social impact