Diet and inflammation have been suggested to be important risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC). In the present study, we examined the association between the dietary inflammatory index (DII) and the risk of CRC in a multi-centre case-control study conducted between 1992 and 1996 in Italy. The study included 1225 incident colon cancer cases, 728 incident rectal cancer cases and 4154 controls hospitalised for acute non-neoplastic diseases. The DII was computed based on dietary intake assessed using a validated seventy-eight-item FFQ that included assessment of alcohol intake. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the OR adjusted for age, sex, study centre, education, BMI, alcohol drinking, physical activity and family history of CRC. Energy intake was adjusted using the residual method. Subjects with higher DII scores (i.e. with a more pro-inflammatory diet) had a higher risk of CRC, with the DII being used both as a continuous variable (ORcontinuous 1·13, 95% CI 1·09, 1·18) and as a categorical variable (ORquintile 5 v. 1 1·55, 95% CI 1·29, 1·85; P for trend <0·0001). Similar results were observed when the analyses were carried out separately for colon and rectal cancer cases. These results indicate that a pro-inflammatory diet is associated with an increased risk of CRC.

Inflammatory potential of diet and risk of colorectal cancer : a case-control study from Italy / N. Shivappa, A. Zucchetto, M. Montella, D. Serraino, S.E. Steck, C. La Vecchia, J.R. Hébert. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION. - ISSN 0007-1145. - 114:1(2015 Jul 14), pp. 152-158. [10.1017/S0007114515001828]

Inflammatory potential of diet and risk of colorectal cancer : a case-control study from Italy

A. Zucchetto;C. La Vecchia
Penultimo
;
2015

Abstract

Diet and inflammation have been suggested to be important risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC). In the present study, we examined the association between the dietary inflammatory index (DII) and the risk of CRC in a multi-centre case-control study conducted between 1992 and 1996 in Italy. The study included 1225 incident colon cancer cases, 728 incident rectal cancer cases and 4154 controls hospitalised for acute non-neoplastic diseases. The DII was computed based on dietary intake assessed using a validated seventy-eight-item FFQ that included assessment of alcohol intake. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the OR adjusted for age, sex, study centre, education, BMI, alcohol drinking, physical activity and family history of CRC. Energy intake was adjusted using the residual method. Subjects with higher DII scores (i.e. with a more pro-inflammatory diet) had a higher risk of CRC, with the DII being used both as a continuous variable (ORcontinuous 1·13, 95% CI 1·09, 1·18) and as a categorical variable (ORquintile 5 v. 1 1·55, 95% CI 1·29, 1·85; P for trend <0·0001). Similar results were observed when the analyses were carried out separately for colon and rectal cancer cases. These results indicate that a pro-inflammatory diet is associated with an increased risk of CRC.
Colorectal cancer; Diet; Inflammation; Italy; Adult; Aged; Alcohol Drinking; Body Mass Index; Case-Control Studies; Colonic Neoplasms; Diet; Diet Records; Energy Intake; Exercise; Female; Humans; Inflammation; Italy; Life Style; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Rectal Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Surveys and Questionnaires; Young Adult; Medicine (miscellaneous); Nutrition and Dietetics; Medicine (all)
Settore MED/01 - Statistica Medica
14-lug-2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
download.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 125.86 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
125.86 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/373309
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 41
  • Scopus 75
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 67
social impact