This essay aims to examine some formal gender inequalities within the Italian law in force – i.e. cases in which Italian legal norms provide a different regulation according to features connected to the recipients’ gender. In particular, after a brief overview of the main kinds of justifications of formal inequalities within the contemporary debate (§ 2), and a brief presentation of the justifications of formal inequalities that can be traced back to the Italian Constitution (§ 3), I will distinguish five types of formal gender inequalities depending on their possible justification (or its absence). In particular, I will distinguish: (a) formal gender inequalities which are not reasonably justifiable (§§ 4, 4.1); (b) formal gender inequalities which aim to obtain an equality of certain opportunities (§§ 5.1, 5.2); (c) formal gender inequalities which are directed to achieve an equality of certain results (§§ 5.2, 6); (d) formal gender inequalities which seek to ensure a special protection (§ 7); and, finally, (e) formal gender inequalities founded on (reasons related to) gender identity (§ 8). For each type, I will examine the most pervasive examples: this analysis doesn’t want to be exhaustive, but it aims to discuss the most important formal gender inequalities, i.e. the most common (affecting a considerable number of men and women) and the most relevant (which have a significant impact on the distribution of legal rights and duties).

Diversi per diritto : le diseguaglianze formali di genere e le loro giustificazioni nel diritto italiano vigente / F. Poggi. - In: DIRITTO & QUESTIONI PUBBLICHE. - ISSN 1825-0173. - 15:2(2015), pp. 9-36.

Diversi per diritto : le diseguaglianze formali di genere e le loro giustificazioni nel diritto italiano vigente

F. Poggi
Primo
2015

Abstract

This essay aims to examine some formal gender inequalities within the Italian law in force – i.e. cases in which Italian legal norms provide a different regulation according to features connected to the recipients’ gender. In particular, after a brief overview of the main kinds of justifications of formal inequalities within the contemporary debate (§ 2), and a brief presentation of the justifications of formal inequalities that can be traced back to the Italian Constitution (§ 3), I will distinguish five types of formal gender inequalities depending on their possible justification (or its absence). In particular, I will distinguish: (a) formal gender inequalities which are not reasonably justifiable (§§ 4, 4.1); (b) formal gender inequalities which aim to obtain an equality of certain opportunities (§§ 5.1, 5.2); (c) formal gender inequalities which are directed to achieve an equality of certain results (§§ 5.2, 6); (d) formal gender inequalities which seek to ensure a special protection (§ 7); and, finally, (e) formal gender inequalities founded on (reasons related to) gender identity (§ 8). For each type, I will examine the most pervasive examples: this analysis doesn’t want to be exhaustive, but it aims to discuss the most important formal gender inequalities, i.e. the most common (affecting a considerable number of men and women) and the most relevant (which have a significant impact on the distribution of legal rights and duties).
gender; inequalities; law; formal inequalities; maternity
Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia del Diritto
2015
http://www.dirittoequestionipubbliche.org/page/2015_n15-2/003_Mono1_Poggi.pdf
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Diversi_per_diritto.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 400.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
400.08 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/365732
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact