Crowdfunding is a new business model in which journalists rely—and depend—on (micro-) payments by a large number of supporters to finance their reporting. In this form of entrepreneurial journalism the roles of publisher, fundraiser and journalist often overlap. This raises questions about conflicts of interest, accountability and transparency. The article presents the results of selected case studies in four different European countries—Germany (Krautreporter), Italy (Occhidellaguerra), the United Kingdom (Contributoria) and the Netherlands (De Correspondent)—as well as one US example (Kickstarter). The study used a two-step methodological approach: first a content analysis of the websites and the Twitter accounts with regard to practices of media accountability, transparency and user participation was undertaken. The aim was to investigate how far ethical challenges in crowdfunded entrepreneurial journalism are accounted for. Second, we present findings from semi-structured interviews with journalists from each crowdfunding. The study provides evidence about the ethical issues in this area, particularly in relation to productiontransparencyandresponsiveness.Thestudyalsoshowsthatinsomecasesofcrowdfunding (platforms), accountability is outsourced and implemented only through the audience participation.

Accountability and Transparency of Entrepreneurial Journalism / C. Porlezza, S. Splendore. - In: JOURNALISM PRACTICE. - ISSN 1751-2786. - 10:2(2016), pp. 196-216. [10.1080/17512786.2015.1124731]

Accountability and Transparency of Entrepreneurial Journalism

S. Splendore
Primo
2016

Abstract

Crowdfunding is a new business model in which journalists rely—and depend—on (micro-) payments by a large number of supporters to finance their reporting. In this form of entrepreneurial journalism the roles of publisher, fundraiser and journalist often overlap. This raises questions about conflicts of interest, accountability and transparency. The article presents the results of selected case studies in four different European countries—Germany (Krautreporter), Italy (Occhidellaguerra), the United Kingdom (Contributoria) and the Netherlands (De Correspondent)—as well as one US example (Kickstarter). The study used a two-step methodological approach: first a content analysis of the websites and the Twitter accounts with regard to practices of media accountability, transparency and user participation was undertaken. The aim was to investigate how far ethical challenges in crowdfunded entrepreneurial journalism are accounted for. Second, we present findings from semi-structured interviews with journalists from each crowdfunding. The study provides evidence about the ethical issues in this area, particularly in relation to productiontransparencyandresponsiveness.Thestudyalsoshowsthatinsomecasesofcrowdfunding (platforms), accountability is outsourced and implemented only through the audience participation.
accountability; crowdfunding; entrepreneurial journalism; participation; transparency
Settore SPS/08 - Sociologia dei Processi Culturali e Comunicativi
2016
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2016-crowdfunding_Sple&Por.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 365.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
365.87 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/361179
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 40
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact