Since its reclassification as a distinct disease entity, clinical research efforts have attempted to establish baseline characteristics and prognostic scoring systems for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Although existing data for baseline characteristics and CMML prognostication have been robustly developed and externally validated, these results have been limited by the small size of single-institution cohorts. We developed an international CMML data set that included 1832 cases across eight centers to establish the frequency of key clinical characteristics. Of note, we found that the majority of CMML patients were classified as World Health Organization CMML-1 and that a 7.5% bone marrow blast cut-point may discriminate prognosis with higher resolution in comparison with the existing 10%. We additionally interrogated existing CMML prognostic models and found that they are all valid and have comparable performance but are vulnerable to upstaging. Using random forest survival analysis for variable discovery, we demonstrated that the prognostic power of clinical variables alone is limited. Last, we confirmed the independent prognostic relevance of ASXL1 gene mutations and identified the novel adverse prognostic impact imparted by CBL mutations. Our data suggest that combinations of clinical and molecular information may be required to improve the accuracy of current CMML prognostication.

An international data set for CMML validates prognostic scoring systems and demonstrates a need for novel prognostication strategies / E. Padron, G. Garcia-Manero, M.M. Patnaik, R. Itzykson, T. Lasho, A. Nazha, R.K. Rampal, M.E. Sanchez, E. Jabbour, N.H. Al Ali, Z. Thompson, S. Colla, P. Fenaux, H.M. Kantarjian, S. Killick, M.A. Sekeres, A.F. List, F. Onida, R.S. Komrokji, A. Tefferi, E. Solary. - In: BLOOD CANCER JOURNAL. - ISSN 2044-5385. - 5:7(2015 Jul), pp. e333.1-e333.8.

An international data set for CMML validates prognostic scoring systems and demonstrates a need for novel prognostication strategies

F. Onida;
2015

Abstract

Since its reclassification as a distinct disease entity, clinical research efforts have attempted to establish baseline characteristics and prognostic scoring systems for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Although existing data for baseline characteristics and CMML prognostication have been robustly developed and externally validated, these results have been limited by the small size of single-institution cohorts. We developed an international CMML data set that included 1832 cases across eight centers to establish the frequency of key clinical characteristics. Of note, we found that the majority of CMML patients were classified as World Health Organization CMML-1 and that a 7.5% bone marrow blast cut-point may discriminate prognosis with higher resolution in comparison with the existing 10%. We additionally interrogated existing CMML prognostic models and found that they are all valid and have comparable performance but are vulnerable to upstaging. Using random forest survival analysis for variable discovery, we demonstrated that the prognostic power of clinical variables alone is limited. Last, we confirmed the independent prognostic relevance of ASXL1 gene mutations and identified the novel adverse prognostic impact imparted by CBL mutations. Our data suggest that combinations of clinical and molecular information may be required to improve the accuracy of current CMML prognostication.
Settore MED/15 - Malattie del Sangue
Settore MED/06 - Oncologia Medica
Settore MED/09 - Medicina Interna
lug-2015
giu-2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CMML - IWG - Blood Cancer Journal 2015.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 2.49 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.49 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/355940
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 42
  • Scopus 119
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 109
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact