Background: Long-term local control in Glioblastoma is rarely achieved and nearly all patients relapse. In this study we evaluated the clinical effect of different treatment approaches in recurrent patients. Methods: Forty-three patients, with median age of 51years were evaluated for salvage treatment: re-resection and/or re-irradiation plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Response was recorded using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0. Twenty-one patients underwent chemotherapy combined with local treatment, surgery and/or radiation therapy, and 22 underwent chemotherapy only. Results: The median follow up was 7months (range 3-28 months). The 1 and 2-years Progression Free Survival was 65 and 10% for combined treatment and 22 and 0% for chemotherapy alone (p < 0.01). The 1 and 2-years overall survival was 69 and 29% for combined and 26 and 0% for chemotherapy alone (p < 0.01). No toxicity greater than grade 2 was recorded. Conclusion: These data showed that in glioblastoma recurrence the combination of several approaches in a limited group of patients is more effective than a single treatment alone. This stress the importance of multimodality treatment whenever clinically feasible.

Multimodality therapy approaches, local and systemic treatment, compared with chemotherapy alone in recurrent glioblastoma / M. Scorsetti, P. Navarria, F. Pessina, A.M. Ascolese, G. D'Agostino, S. Tomatis, F. De Rose, E. Villa, G. Maggi, M. Simonelli, E. Clerici, R. Soffietti, A. Santoro, L. Cozzi, L. Bello. - In: BMC CANCER. - ISSN 1471-2407. - 15(2015 Jun 30), pp. 486.1-486.7. [10.1186/s12885-015-1488-2]

Multimodality therapy approaches, local and systemic treatment, compared with chemotherapy alone in recurrent glioblastoma

L. Bello
2015

Abstract

Background: Long-term local control in Glioblastoma is rarely achieved and nearly all patients relapse. In this study we evaluated the clinical effect of different treatment approaches in recurrent patients. Methods: Forty-three patients, with median age of 51years were evaluated for salvage treatment: re-resection and/or re-irradiation plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Response was recorded using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0. Twenty-one patients underwent chemotherapy combined with local treatment, surgery and/or radiation therapy, and 22 underwent chemotherapy only. Results: The median follow up was 7months (range 3-28 months). The 1 and 2-years Progression Free Survival was 65 and 10% for combined treatment and 22 and 0% for chemotherapy alone (p < 0.01). The 1 and 2-years overall survival was 69 and 29% for combined and 26 and 0% for chemotherapy alone (p < 0.01). No toxicity greater than grade 2 was recorded. Conclusion: These data showed that in glioblastoma recurrence the combination of several approaches in a limited group of patients is more effective than a single treatment alone. This stress the importance of multimodality treatment whenever clinically feasible.
Glioblastoma; Recurrence; Retreatment
Settore MED/27 - Neurochirurgia
30-giu-2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
12885_2015_Article_1488.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 657.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
657.44 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/350911
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact