Several studies have suggested an inverse association between use of combined oral contraceptives (OC) and the risk of colorectal cancer and here we present a meta-analysis of published studies. Articles considered were epidemiological studies published as full papers in English up to June 2000 that included quantitative information on OC use. The pooled relative risks (RR) of colorectal cancer for ever OC use from the 8 case-control studies was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.94), and the pooled estimate from the 4 cohort studies was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.72-0.97). The pooled estimate from all studies combined was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74-0.92), without apparent heterogeneity. Duration of use was not associated with a decrease in risk, but there was some indication that the apparent protection was stronger for women who had used OCs more recently (RR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30-0.71). A better understanding of this potential relation may help informed choice of contraception.

Oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis / E. Fernandez, C. La Vecchia, A. Balducci, L. Chatenoud, S. Franceschi, E. Negri. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER. - ISSN 0007-0920. - 84:5(2001), pp. 722-727.

Oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis

C. La Vecchia
;
E. Negri
2001

Abstract

Several studies have suggested an inverse association between use of combined oral contraceptives (OC) and the risk of colorectal cancer and here we present a meta-analysis of published studies. Articles considered were epidemiological studies published as full papers in English up to June 2000 that included quantitative information on OC use. The pooled relative risks (RR) of colorectal cancer for ever OC use from the 8 case-control studies was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.94), and the pooled estimate from the 4 cohort studies was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.72-0.97). The pooled estimate from all studies combined was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74-0.92), without apparent heterogeneity. Duration of use was not associated with a decrease in risk, but there was some indication that the apparent protection was stronger for women who had used OCs more recently (RR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30-0.71). A better understanding of this potential relation may help informed choice of contraception.
colorectal neoplasms; oral contraceptives; female hormones; meta-analysis
Settore MED/01 - Statistica Medica
2001
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
6691622a.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 78.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
78.94 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/344526
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 37
  • Scopus 171
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 147
social impact