Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a glomerular disease characterized by proteinuria, frequent progression to end-stage renal disease, and recurrence after kidney transplantation in ∼25% of patients, which negatively impacts long-term allograft survival. Experimental studies suggest that abnormalities in T and, possibly, B cells may represent one initial pathogenic trigger, leading to podocyte injury and progressive loss. New data also support the existence of circulating permeability factors able to damage the podocytes, but no single molecule has been consistently identified as the causal pathogenic element in FSGS recurrence. Unfortunately, major progress from mechanistic studies has not translated into substantial advancements in patient treatment, with plasmapheresis (PP) and high doses of cyclosporine (CsA) remaining the mainstays of therapy. Despite consistent experimental and clinical evidence that treatment of proteinuria slows renal function decline in proteinuric nephropathies, maximal use of antiproteinuric agents such as renin angiotensin system antagonists is not routine in the management of FSGS recurrence. More recently, encouraging results have been reported with anti-CD20 depleting antibody rituximab, but further studies are needed to establish its safety/efficacy profile. The authors review recent advancements in understanding the pathophysiology of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) recurrence after kidney transplant and critically discuss the current therapeutic options.

Recent progress in the pathophysiology and treatment of FSGS recurrence / P. Cravedi, J.B. Kopp, G. Remuzzi. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION. - ISSN 1600-6135. - 13:2(2013 Feb), pp. 266-274. [10.1111/ajt.12045]

Recent progress in the pathophysiology and treatment of FSGS recurrence

G. Remuzzi
Ultimo
2013

Abstract

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a glomerular disease characterized by proteinuria, frequent progression to end-stage renal disease, and recurrence after kidney transplantation in ∼25% of patients, which negatively impacts long-term allograft survival. Experimental studies suggest that abnormalities in T and, possibly, B cells may represent one initial pathogenic trigger, leading to podocyte injury and progressive loss. New data also support the existence of circulating permeability factors able to damage the podocytes, but no single molecule has been consistently identified as the causal pathogenic element in FSGS recurrence. Unfortunately, major progress from mechanistic studies has not translated into substantial advancements in patient treatment, with plasmapheresis (PP) and high doses of cyclosporine (CsA) remaining the mainstays of therapy. Despite consistent experimental and clinical evidence that treatment of proteinuria slows renal function decline in proteinuric nephropathies, maximal use of antiproteinuric agents such as renin angiotensin system antagonists is not routine in the management of FSGS recurrence. More recently, encouraging results have been reported with anti-CD20 depleting antibody rituximab, but further studies are needed to establish its safety/efficacy profile. The authors review recent advancements in understanding the pathophysiology of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) recurrence after kidney transplant and critically discuss the current therapeutic options.
FSGS; glomerulonephritis; kidney transplant; permeability factor; proteinuria; Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Biopsy; Cyclosporine; Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental; Graft Survival; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Nephrology; Podocytes; Proteinuria; Rats; Recurrence; Renin-Angiotensin System; Transplantation; Immunology and Allergy; Pharmacology (medical)
Settore MED/14 - Nefrologia
feb-2013
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/332516
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 35
  • Scopus 100
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 81
social impact