Since the 1986, the National Institute for Occupational Accident Insurance (INAIL) provides each single Region with the occupational accident data on magnetic support. This strengthens the need to critically evaluate the most commonly used risk indicators. In this paper we discuss advantages and limits of the usual frequency and severity measures; the formulae for the standard errors are also given. A method proposed by I. Bross (1958), the RIDIT Analysis, is considered and exemplified. The appealing properties of this method ask for a more extensive application in this field.

Considerazioni su alcuni indicatori di rischio di infortunio sul lavoro / A. Bellini, M. Braga, P. Duca. - In: EPIDEMIOLOGIA E PREVENZIONE. - ISSN 1120-9763. - 12:44(1990 Sep), pp. 12-18.

Considerazioni su alcuni indicatori di rischio di infortunio sul lavoro

P. Duca
1990

Abstract

Since the 1986, the National Institute for Occupational Accident Insurance (INAIL) provides each single Region with the occupational accident data on magnetic support. This strengthens the need to critically evaluate the most commonly used risk indicators. In this paper we discuss advantages and limits of the usual frequency and severity measures; the formulae for the standard errors are also given. A method proposed by I. Bross (1958), the RIDIT Analysis, is considered and exemplified. The appealing properties of this method ask for a more extensive application in this field.
Humans; Models, Statistical; Risk Factors; Accidents, Occupational
Settore MED/01 - Statistica Medica
set-1990
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/321772
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact