The article explores the organisational impact of evaluation and control mechanisms on universities from the point of view of accountability. Three case studies are analysed with the aim of understanding the significance of these systems both at corporate governance level and in relation to their influence on the behaviour of the academic staff. Open-ended, in-depth interviews were conducted in three universities from two countries in order to collect the opinions of the top managers and academics with different roles and seniority. The combination of four different but partially overlapping analytical frameworks (new public management, neo-institutional sociology, organisational control theory and sense-making) has supported the analysis and the interpretation of the empirical material collected. The analysis sheds light on a somewhat neglected aspect: the interdependence among various systems and tools that simultaneously operate in an organisation and inevitably combine to influence the behaviour of its employees. On this basis indications are given in order to facilitate the introduction and the management of more appropriate evaluation mechanisms both at the national system and the organisational level.

Quest for accountability : exploring the evaluation process of universities / M. Minelli, G. Rebora, M. Turri. - In: QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION. - ISSN 1353-8322. - 21:2(2015), pp. 103-131. [10.1080/13538322.2015.1066611]

Quest for accountability : exploring the evaluation process of universities

M. Turri
2015

Abstract

The article explores the organisational impact of evaluation and control mechanisms on universities from the point of view of accountability. Three case studies are analysed with the aim of understanding the significance of these systems both at corporate governance level and in relation to their influence on the behaviour of the academic staff. Open-ended, in-depth interviews were conducted in three universities from two countries in order to collect the opinions of the top managers and academics with different roles and seniority. The combination of four different but partially overlapping analytical frameworks (new public management, neo-institutional sociology, organisational control theory and sense-making) has supported the analysis and the interpretation of the empirical material collected. The analysis sheds light on a somewhat neglected aspect: the interdependence among various systems and tools that simultaneously operate in an organisation and inevitably combine to influence the behaviour of its employees. On this basis indications are given in order to facilitate the introduction and the management of more appropriate evaluation mechanisms both at the national system and the organisational level.
accountability; evaluation; neo-institutional sociology; new public management; organisational control theory; sense-making
Settore SECS-P/07 - Economia Aziendale
2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
qhe_2015_m.r.t.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 273.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
273.18 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
13538322.2015.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 456.51 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
456.51 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/293727
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact