Objectives: The management strategy remains controversial for patients presenting with type A acute aortic dissection with cerebrovascular accident or coma. The present study aimed to help guide surgeons treating these high-risk patients. Methods: Of 1873 patients with type A acute aortic dissection enrolled in the International Registry for Acute Dissection, 87 (4.7%) presented with cerebrovascular accident and 54 (2.9%) with coma. The hospital and 5-year results were stratified by the presence and type of brain injury (no injury vs stroke vs coma) and management type (medical vs surgical). Independent predictors of short- and mid-term survival were identified. Results: Presentation with shock, hypotension, or tamponade (46.8% vs 25.2%; P < .001) and arch vessel involvement (55.0% vs 36.1%; P < .001) was more likely in patients with brain injury. Surgical management was avoided more often in patients with coma (33.3%) or cerebrovascular accident (24.1%) than in those without brain injury (11.1%; P < .001). The overall hospital mortality was 22.7% without brain injury, 40.2% with cerebrovascular accident, and 63.0% with coma (P < .001). Mortality varied among the management types for both cerebrovascular accident (76.2% medical vs 27.0% surgical; P < .001) and coma (100% medical vs 44.4% surgical; P < .001). Postoperatively, cerebrovascular accident and coma resolved in 84.3% and 78.8% of cases, respectively. On logistic regression analysis, surgery was protective against mortality in patients presenting with brain injury (odds ratio 0.058; P < .001). The 5-year survival of patients presenting with cerebrovascular accident and coma was 23.8% and 0% after medical management versus 67.1% and 57.1% after surgery (log rank, P < .001), respectively. Conclusions: Brain injury at presentation adversely affects hospital survival of patients with type A acute aortic dissection. In the present observational study, the patients selected to undergo surgery demonstrated improved late survival and frequent reversal of neurologic deficits.

Patients with type A acute aortic dissection presenting with major brain injury : should we operate on them? / M. Di Eusanio, H.J. Patel, C.A. Nienaber, D.M. Montgomery, A. Korach, T.M. Sundt, C. Devincentiis, M. Voehringer, M.D. Peterson, T. Myrmel, G. Folesani, M. Larsen, N.D. Desai, J.E. Bavaria, J.J. Appoo, T.M. Kieser, R. Fattori, K. Eagle, R. Di Bartolomeo, S. Trimarchi. - In: JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY. - ISSN 0022-5223. - 145:3 suppl.(2013), pp. S213-S221. ((Intervento presentato al convegno Aortic Surgery Symposium of the American Association for Thoracic-Surgery tenutosi a New York nel 2012.

Patients with type A acute aortic dissection presenting with major brain injury : should we operate on them?

S. Trimarchi
Ultimo
2013

Abstract

Objectives: The management strategy remains controversial for patients presenting with type A acute aortic dissection with cerebrovascular accident or coma. The present study aimed to help guide surgeons treating these high-risk patients. Methods: Of 1873 patients with type A acute aortic dissection enrolled in the International Registry for Acute Dissection, 87 (4.7%) presented with cerebrovascular accident and 54 (2.9%) with coma. The hospital and 5-year results were stratified by the presence and type of brain injury (no injury vs stroke vs coma) and management type (medical vs surgical). Independent predictors of short- and mid-term survival were identified. Results: Presentation with shock, hypotension, or tamponade (46.8% vs 25.2%; P < .001) and arch vessel involvement (55.0% vs 36.1%; P < .001) was more likely in patients with brain injury. Surgical management was avoided more often in patients with coma (33.3%) or cerebrovascular accident (24.1%) than in those without brain injury (11.1%; P < .001). The overall hospital mortality was 22.7% without brain injury, 40.2% with cerebrovascular accident, and 63.0% with coma (P < .001). Mortality varied among the management types for both cerebrovascular accident (76.2% medical vs 27.0% surgical; P < .001) and coma (100% medical vs 44.4% surgical; P < .001). Postoperatively, cerebrovascular accident and coma resolved in 84.3% and 78.8% of cases, respectively. On logistic regression analysis, surgery was protective against mortality in patients presenting with brain injury (odds ratio 0.058; P < .001). The 5-year survival of patients presenting with cerebrovascular accident and coma was 23.8% and 0% after medical management versus 67.1% and 57.1% after surgery (log rank, P < .001), respectively. Conclusions: Brain injury at presentation adversely affects hospital survival of patients with type A acute aortic dissection. In the present observational study, the patients selected to undergo surgery demonstrated improved late survival and frequent reversal of neurologic deficits.
Acute Disease; Aged; Aneurysm, Dissecting; Aortic Aneurysm; Brain Injuries; Canada; Coma; Europe; Female; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Israel; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Patient Selection; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Vascular Surgical Procedures; Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine; Surgery; Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Settore MED/22 - Chirurgia Vascolare
2013
American Association for Thoracic-Surgery
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S002252231201495X-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 716.7 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
716.7 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/285502
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 104
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 85
social impact