Three-dimensional models of the five human muscarinic receptors were obtained from their known sequences. Homol. modeling based on the crystallog. structure of bovine rhodopsin yielded models compatible with known results from site-directed mutagenesis studies. The only exceptions were the cytoplasmic loop 3 (CL3) in the five receptors, and the large C-terminal domain in M1. Here, homol. modeling with other closely related proteins allowed to solve these gaps. A detailed comparative discussion of the five models is given. The second part of the work involved docking expts. with the physiol. ligand acetylcholine, again yielding results entirely compatible with results from mutagenesis expts. The study revealed analogies and differences between the five receptors in the residues, and interactions leading to the recognition and binding of acetylcholine

Muscarinic receptors: a comparative analysis of structural features and binding modes through homology modelling and molecular docking / A. Pedretti, G. Vistoli, C. Marconi, B. Testa. - In: CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY. - ISSN 1612-1872. - 3:5(2006), pp. 481-501.

Muscarinic receptors: a comparative analysis of structural features and binding modes through homology modelling and molecular docking

A. Pedretti
Primo
;
G. Vistoli
Secondo
;
2006

Abstract

Three-dimensional models of the five human muscarinic receptors were obtained from their known sequences. Homol. modeling based on the crystallog. structure of bovine rhodopsin yielded models compatible with known results from site-directed mutagenesis studies. The only exceptions were the cytoplasmic loop 3 (CL3) in the five receptors, and the large C-terminal domain in M1. Here, homol. modeling with other closely related proteins allowed to solve these gaps. A detailed comparative discussion of the five models is given. The second part of the work involved docking expts. with the physiol. ligand acetylcholine, again yielding results entirely compatible with results from mutagenesis expts. The study revealed analogies and differences between the five receptors in the residues, and interactions leading to the recognition and binding of acetylcholine
English
Muscarinic receptors Role: BSU (Biological study, unclassified), PEP (Physical, engineering or chemical process), PRP (Properties), PYP (Physical process), BIOL (Biological study), PROC (Process) (M1; muscarinic receptor subtype comparative anal. of structural features and binding modes through homol. modeling and mol. docking); Muscarinic receptors Role: BSU (Biological study, unclassified), PEP (Physical, engineering or chemical process), PRP (Properties), PYP (Physical process), BIOL (Biological study), PROC (Process) (M2; muscarinic receptor subtype comparative anal. of structural features and binding modes through homol. modeling and mol. docking); Muscarinic receptors Role: BSU (Biological study, unclassified), PEP (Physical, engineering or chemical process), PRP (Properties), PYP (Physical process), BIOL (Biological study), PROC (Process) (M3; muscarinic receptor subtype comparative anal. of structural features and binding modes through homol. modeling and mol. docking); Muscarinic receptors Role: BSU (Biological study, unclassified), PEP (Physical, engineering or chemical process), PRP (Properties), PYP (Physical process), BIOL (Biological study), PROC (Process) (M4; muscarinic receptor subtype comparative anal. of structural features and binding modes through homol. modeling and mol. docking); Muscarinic receptors Role: BSU (Biological study, unclassified), PEP (Physical, engineering or chemical process), PRP (Properties), PYP (Physical process), BIOL (Biological study), PROC (Process) (M5; muscarinic receptor subtype comparative anal. of structural features and binding modes through homol. modeling and mol. docking); Structure-activity relationship (ligand-binding; muscarinic receptor subtype comparative anal. of structural features and binding modes through homol. modeling and mol. docking); Human; Simulation and Modeling (muscarinic receptor subtype comparative anal. of structural features and binding modes through homol. modeling and mol. docking)
Settore CHIM/08 - Chimica Farmaceutica
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
2006
Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta
3
5
481
501
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/112635733/PDFSTART
AN 2006:551403
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Muscarinic receptors: a comparative analysis of structural features and binding modes through homology modelling and molecular docking / A. Pedretti, G. Vistoli, C. Marconi, B. Testa. - In: CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY. - ISSN 1612-1872. - 3:5(2006), pp. 481-501.
none
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
4
262
Article (author)
si
A. Pedretti, G. Vistoli, C. Marconi, B. Testa
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/25911
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact