In a number of recent papers, advocates of the so-called “Experimental Philosophy” movement have launched a quite radical attack against traditional philosophical methods – such as conceptual analysis, thought experiments, and appeal to intuitions. Against such an attack, in this paper I defend the thesis that once we interpret the traditional methods of philosophical inquire in broadly Quinean terms, the sort of empirical evidence that experimental philosophers employ turns out to be irrelevant.
Experimental philosophy and metaphysics / G. Torrengo. - In: METHODE. - ISSN 2281-0498. - (2013), pp. 195-205. [10.13135/2281-0498%2F27]
Experimental philosophy and metaphysics
G. Torrengo
2013
Abstract
In a number of recent papers, advocates of the so-called “Experimental Philosophy” movement have launched a quite radical attack against traditional philosophical methods – such as conceptual analysis, thought experiments, and appeal to intuitions. Against such an attack, in this paper I defend the thesis that once we interpret the traditional methods of philosophical inquire in broadly Quinean terms, the sort of empirical evidence that experimental philosophers employ turns out to be irrelevant.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
30-115-2-PB.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
177.58 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
177.58 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.