Background: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) occurs in a large share of transplant recipients and it is the leading cause of graft loss despite the introduction of new and effective immunosuppressants. The reduction in renal function secondary to immunologic and non-immunologic CAN leads to several complications, including anemia and calcium-phosphorus metabolism imbalance and may be associated to worsening Health-Related Quality of Life. We sought to evaluate the relationship between kidney function and Euro-Qol 5 Dimension Index (EQ-5Dindex) scores after kidney transplantation and evaluate whether cross-cultural differences exist between UK and US.Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of existing data gathered from two cross-sectional studies. We enrolled 233 and 209 subjects aged 18-74 years who received a kidney transplant in US and UK respectively. For the present analysis we excluded recipients with multiple or multi-organ transplantation, creatinine kinase ≥200 U/L, acute renal failure, and without creatinine assessments in 3 months pre-enrollment leaving 281 subjects overall. The questionnaires were administered independently in the two centers. Both packets included the EQ-5Dindex and socio-demographic items. We augmented the analytical dataset with information abstracted from clinical charts and administrative records including selected comorbidities and biochemistry test results. We used ordinary least squares and quantile regression adjusted for socio-demographic and clinical characteristics to assess the association between EQ-5Dindex and severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD).Results: CKD severity was negatively associated with EQ-5Dindex in both samples (UK: ρ= -0.20, p=0.02; US: ρ= -0.21, p=0.02). The mean adjusted disutility associated to CKD stage 5 compared to CKD stage 1-2 was Δ= -0.38 in the UK sample, Δ= -0.11 in the US sample and Δ= -0.22 in the whole sample. The adjusted median disutility associated to CKD stage 5 compared to CKD stage 1-2 for the whole sample was 0.18 (p<0.01, quantile regression). Center effect was not statistically significant.Conclusions: Impaired renal function is associated with reduced health-related quality of life independent of possible confounders, center-effect and analytic framework. © 2012 Neri et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Characterizing the relationship between health utility and renal function after kidney transplantation in UK and US : a cross-sectional study / L. Neri, P. Mcewan, K. Sennfält, K. Baboolal. - In: HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES. - ISSN 1477-7525. - 10:1(2012), pp. 139.1-139.8. [10.1186/1477-7525-10-139]

Characterizing the relationship between health utility and renal function after kidney transplantation in UK and US : a cross-sectional study

L. Neri
Primo
;
2012

Abstract

Background: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) occurs in a large share of transplant recipients and it is the leading cause of graft loss despite the introduction of new and effective immunosuppressants. The reduction in renal function secondary to immunologic and non-immunologic CAN leads to several complications, including anemia and calcium-phosphorus metabolism imbalance and may be associated to worsening Health-Related Quality of Life. We sought to evaluate the relationship between kidney function and Euro-Qol 5 Dimension Index (EQ-5Dindex) scores after kidney transplantation and evaluate whether cross-cultural differences exist between UK and US.Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of existing data gathered from two cross-sectional studies. We enrolled 233 and 209 subjects aged 18-74 years who received a kidney transplant in US and UK respectively. For the present analysis we excluded recipients with multiple or multi-organ transplantation, creatinine kinase ≥200 U/L, acute renal failure, and without creatinine assessments in 3 months pre-enrollment leaving 281 subjects overall. The questionnaires were administered independently in the two centers. Both packets included the EQ-5Dindex and socio-demographic items. We augmented the analytical dataset with information abstracted from clinical charts and administrative records including selected comorbidities and biochemistry test results. We used ordinary least squares and quantile regression adjusted for socio-demographic and clinical characteristics to assess the association between EQ-5Dindex and severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD).Results: CKD severity was negatively associated with EQ-5Dindex in both samples (UK: ρ= -0.20, p=0.02; US: ρ= -0.21, p=0.02). The mean adjusted disutility associated to CKD stage 5 compared to CKD stage 1-2 was Δ= -0.38 in the UK sample, Δ= -0.11 in the US sample and Δ= -0.22 in the whole sample. The adjusted median disutility associated to CKD stage 5 compared to CKD stage 1-2 for the whole sample was 0.18 (p<0.01, quantile regression). Center effect was not statistically significant.Conclusions: Impaired renal function is associated with reduced health-related quality of life independent of possible confounders, center-effect and analytic framework. © 2012 Neri et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
chronic kidney disease; kidney function; kidney transplantation; quality-adjusted life years; self-reported outcomes; adolescent; adult; aged; cross-sectional studies; female; health status; humans; male; middle aged; models, statistical; outcome assessment (Health Care); quality of life; questionnaires; severity of Illness index; United Nations; United States; young adult; kidney function tests; kidney transplantation; public health, environmental and occupational health
Settore MED/14 - Nefrologia
Settore MED/44 - Medicina del Lavoro
2012
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1477-7525-10-139.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 377.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
377.55 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/251071
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact