Objective The aim of this review was to compare the efficiency of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and conventional intraoral radiography for the detection of vertical root fractures (VRFs).Study Design Data from comparative and noncomparative studies investigating CBCT, conventional radiography, or both for the diagnosis of VRFs were searched. The main outcome variables were sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the techniques. Data were separated into 4 groups: in vivo, ex vivo/untreated teeth, ex vivo/treated teeth, and ex vivo with post. The weighted mean of each parameter was estimated.Results Twelve articles were considered for the analysis. There was a large heterogeneity of the characteristics of the studies and a wide variability in outcome variables. No significant differences were found between radiographic techniques.Conclusions No superiority of CBCT compared with conventional radiography was found for VRF detection. Adequate choice of voxel size seems to be important when diagnosing VRFs.

Cone beam computed tomography for the diagnosis of vertical root fractures : a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis [Recensione] / S. Corbella, M. Del Fabbro, A. Tamse, E. Rosen, I. Tsesis, S. Taschieri. - In: ORAL SURGERY, ORAL MEDICINE, ORAL PATHOLOGY AND ORAL RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 2212-4403. - 118:5(2014), pp. 593-602.

Cone beam computed tomography for the diagnosis of vertical root fractures : a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

S. Corbella
Primo
;
M. Del Fabbro
Secondo
;
S. Taschieri
Ultimo
2014

Abstract

Objective The aim of this review was to compare the efficiency of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and conventional intraoral radiography for the detection of vertical root fractures (VRFs).Study Design Data from comparative and noncomparative studies investigating CBCT, conventional radiography, or both for the diagnosis of VRFs were searched. The main outcome variables were sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the techniques. Data were separated into 4 groups: in vivo, ex vivo/untreated teeth, ex vivo/treated teeth, and ex vivo with post. The weighted mean of each parameter was estimated.Results Twelve articles were considered for the analysis. There was a large heterogeneity of the characteristics of the studies and a wide variability in outcome variables. No significant differences were found between radiographic techniques.Conclusions No superiority of CBCT compared with conventional radiography was found for VRF detection. Adequate choice of voxel size seems to be important when diagnosing VRFs.
endodontically treated teeth; intracanal metallic post; periapical radiography; maxillary 1st; 2nd molars; intraoral radiography; scans; tooth; CBCT; dimensions
Settore MED/28 - Malattie Odontostomatologiche
Centro di Ricerca per la Salute Orale
Centro di Ricerca in Implantologia Orale
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S2212440314006798-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 248.17 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
248.17 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/250036
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 43
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact