OBJECTIVE: Few studies have compared simultaneously different antidepressants in long-term treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Long-term prevention of recurrences should be the main goal of MDD treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare antidepressants of different pharmacological classes in terms of retention in treatment (no discontinuation for recurrences, hospitalizations, side effects). METHODS:One hundred and fifty outpatients with an MDD diagnosis, treated with antidepressants in mono-therapy, were included. Follow-up period was set at 24 months, and information have been obtained from charts, interviews with patients and their relatives, and from the Lombardy regional register. A survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier) was performed, considering recurrences, hospitalizations, or discontinuation due to side effects as 'death' events. RESULTS: In our sample, 48.7% of the patients presented a recurrence within the first 2 years of treatment. Bupropion appears less effective in long-term treatment of MDD than the other compared antidepressants, with exception of fluoxetine (p = 0.09), amitriptyline (p = 0.13), fluvoxamine (p = 0.83), venlafaxine (p = 0.5), and trazodone (p = 0.58). Fluvoxamine appears to be less effective than citalopram (p = 0.036), paroxetine (p = 0.037), clomipramine (p = 0.05), sertraline (p = 0.011), and duloxetine (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Bupropion and fluvoxamine appear less effective in long-term treatment of MDD. These results should be confirmed by randomized placebo-controlled prospective studies with larger samples.

Are antidepressants equally effective in the long-term treatment of major depressive disorder? / M. Buoli, C. Cumerlato Melter, A. Caldiroli, A. Altamura. - In: HUMAN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY. - ISSN 0885-6222. - 30:1(2015), pp. 21-27.

Are antidepressants equally effective in the long-term treatment of major depressive disorder?

M. Buoli
;
A. Caldiroli
Penultimo
;
A. Altamura
Ultimo
2015

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have compared simultaneously different antidepressants in long-term treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Long-term prevention of recurrences should be the main goal of MDD treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare antidepressants of different pharmacological classes in terms of retention in treatment (no discontinuation for recurrences, hospitalizations, side effects). METHODS:One hundred and fifty outpatients with an MDD diagnosis, treated with antidepressants in mono-therapy, were included. Follow-up period was set at 24 months, and information have been obtained from charts, interviews with patients and their relatives, and from the Lombardy regional register. A survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier) was performed, considering recurrences, hospitalizations, or discontinuation due to side effects as 'death' events. RESULTS: In our sample, 48.7% of the patients presented a recurrence within the first 2 years of treatment. Bupropion appears less effective in long-term treatment of MDD than the other compared antidepressants, with exception of fluoxetine (p = 0.09), amitriptyline (p = 0.13), fluvoxamine (p = 0.83), venlafaxine (p = 0.5), and trazodone (p = 0.58). Fluvoxamine appears to be less effective than citalopram (p = 0.036), paroxetine (p = 0.037), clomipramine (p = 0.05), sertraline (p = 0.011), and duloxetine (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Bupropion and fluvoxamine appear less effective in long-term treatment of MDD. These results should be confirmed by randomized placebo-controlled prospective studies with larger samples.
major depressive disorder (MDD); antidepressants; maintenance treatment
Settore MED/25 - Psichiatria
2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
hup2447.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 404.19 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
404.19 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/249793
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact