Using a ‘structural’ gravity-like model, this paper first provides estimates of bilateral ‘border effects’ in food trade among the Quad countries (the US, Canada, Japan and the EU) at the ISIC 4-digit. It then investigates the underlying reasons of border effect, assessing the role played by policy barriers (tariffs and NTBs) with respect to barriers unrelated to trade policy, such as information and cultural proximity. In contrast with several previous findings, our results show that tariffs and NTBs are part of the story in explaining national border effects. Interestingly, in both the EU and the US NTBs significantly dominate the trade reduction effect induced by tariffs. However, the results show that elements linked to information related costs, and ‘home bias’ in preference, matter a great deal in explaining the magnitude of border effects. These findings have implications for the economic and welfare significance of national borders.

Explaining national border effects in the QUAD food trade / A. Olper, V.M.P. Raimondi - In: Contributions of Agricultural Economics to Critical Policy Issues / [a cura di] Julian, Alston; Philip, Pardey; Malcolm, Wegener. - [s.l] : IAAE, 2006 Aug. (( Intervento presentato al 26th. convegno 26th Conference of the Internationl Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) ‘Contributions of Agricultural Economics to Critical Policy Issues’ tenutosi a Gold Coast, Australia nel 2006.

Explaining national border effects in the QUAD food trade

A. Olper;V.M.P. Raimondi
2006

Abstract

Using a ‘structural’ gravity-like model, this paper first provides estimates of bilateral ‘border effects’ in food trade among the Quad countries (the US, Canada, Japan and the EU) at the ISIC 4-digit. It then investigates the underlying reasons of border effect, assessing the role played by policy barriers (tariffs and NTBs) with respect to barriers unrelated to trade policy, such as information and cultural proximity. In contrast with several previous findings, our results show that tariffs and NTBs are part of the story in explaining national border effects. Interestingly, in both the EU and the US NTBs significantly dominate the trade reduction effect induced by tariffs. However, the results show that elements linked to information related costs, and ‘home bias’ in preference, matter a great deal in explaining the magnitude of border effects. These findings have implications for the economic and welfare significance of national borders.
English
Border Effect, Food Trade, Market Access, Ad Valorem Equivalents, Preferences, Information Costs
Settore AGR/01 - Economia ed Estimo Rurale
Intervento a convegno
Contributions of Agricultural Economics to Critical Policy Issues
Julian, Alston; Philip, Pardey; Malcolm, Wegener
IAAE
ago-2006
Volume a diffusione internazionale
26th Conference of the Internationl Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) ‘Contributions of Agricultural Economics to Critical Policy Issues’
Gold Coast, Australia
2006
26th
IAAE
Convegno internazionale
Intervento inviato
A. Olper, V.M.P. Raimondi
Book Part (author)
none
273
Explaining national border effects in the QUAD food trade / A. Olper, V.M.P. Raimondi - In: Contributions of Agricultural Economics to Critical Policy Issues / [a cura di] Julian, Alston; Philip, Pardey; Malcolm, Wegener. - [s.l] : IAAE, 2006 Aug. (( Intervento presentato al 26th. convegno 26th Conference of the Internationl Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) ‘Contributions of Agricultural Economics to Critical Policy Issues’ tenutosi a Gold Coast, Australia nel 2006.
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
2
Prodotti della ricerca::03 - Contributo in volume
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/24513
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact