The Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi started, in 1996, a randomized trial for the initial treatment of elderly patients (older than 65 years) with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (B-DLCL) comparing 6 courses of Mini-CEOP vs 8 weeks of P-VEBEC chemotherapy. Study objectives were survival, response and Quality of Life (QoL). Two hundred and thirty-two patients were evaluable for final analysis. Complete Response (CR) and Overall Response Rates (ORR) were 54% vs 66% (p = 0.107) and 90% vs 78% (p = 0.021) for P-VEBEC and Mini-CEOP, respectively. With a median follow-up of 72 months, the 5-year Overall Survival (OS), Relapse Free Survival (RFS), and Failure Free Survival (FFS) were 32%, 52%, and 21%, respectively. Subjects achieving a CR showed improvement of QoL regardless of treatment arm. Both Mini-CEOP and P-VEBEC determined a similar outcome for elderly patients with B-DLCL, with a third of patients alive after more than 6 years of follow-up. Both regimens can be considered equally for combination treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody.

Long term results of a randomized study performed by Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi comparing MINI-CEOP VS P-VEBEC in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma / F. Merli, M. Bertini, S. Luminari, R. Mozzana, B. Botto, A.M. Liberati, L. Baldini, G. Cabras, F.D. Vito, L. Orsucci, E. Naglieri, G. Polimeno, L. Marcheselli, E. Pennese, U. Vitolo, M. Federico, E. Gallo. - In: LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA. - ISSN 1042-8194. - 48:2(2007), pp. 367-373.

Long term results of a randomized study performed by Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi comparing MINI-CEOP VS P-VEBEC in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

L. Baldini;
2007

Abstract

The Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi started, in 1996, a randomized trial for the initial treatment of elderly patients (older than 65 years) with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (B-DLCL) comparing 6 courses of Mini-CEOP vs 8 weeks of P-VEBEC chemotherapy. Study objectives were survival, response and Quality of Life (QoL). Two hundred and thirty-two patients were evaluable for final analysis. Complete Response (CR) and Overall Response Rates (ORR) were 54% vs 66% (p = 0.107) and 90% vs 78% (p = 0.021) for P-VEBEC and Mini-CEOP, respectively. With a median follow-up of 72 months, the 5-year Overall Survival (OS), Relapse Free Survival (RFS), and Failure Free Survival (FFS) were 32%, 52%, and 21%, respectively. Subjects achieving a CR showed improvement of QoL regardless of treatment arm. Both Mini-CEOP and P-VEBEC determined a similar outcome for elderly patients with B-DLCL, with a third of patients alive after more than 6 years of follow-up. Both regimens can be considered equally for combination treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody.
Settore MED/15 - Malattie del Sangue
2007
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/24116
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact