Martin Jones has criticized my account of the methodology of experimental economics on three points: the impossibility of testing external validity claims in the laboratory, my reconstruction of external validity inferences as analogical arguments, and the distinction between laboratory and non-laboratory sciences. I defend my account here and try to eliminate some misunderstandings that may have prompted Jones's criticism. Copyright © Cambridge University Press.
THE ROLE OF EXPERIMENTS IN ECONOMICS: REPLY TO JONES / F. Guala. - In: ECONOMICS AND PHILOSOPHY. - ISSN 0266-2671. - 30:03(2014), pp. 503-511.
THE ROLE OF EXPERIMENTS IN ECONOMICS: REPLY TO JONES
F. GualaPrimo
2014
Abstract
Martin Jones has criticized my account of the methodology of experimental economics on three points: the impossibility of testing external validity claims in the laboratory, my reconstruction of external validity inferences as analogical arguments, and the distinction between laboratory and non-laboratory sciences. I defend my account here and try to eliminate some misunderstandings that may have prompted Jones's criticism. Copyright © Cambridge University Press.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
