AIM: To evaluate the clinical implications of c-kit (CD117) expression in plasma cell myeloma (PCM). METHODS AND RESULTS: We first evaluated the reliability of immunohistochemistry in assessing c-kit expression by comparing the results with those obtained by flow cytometry and gene expression arrays in 22 PCM and in 10 PCM cell lines. Immunohistochemical results showed a perfect concordance with those of flow cytometry; likewise, immunohistochemical and gene expression data were also concordant in all but one PCM and cell lines analysed. Then, we investigated the clinical implications of c-kit immunoreactivity in bone marrow biopsies of 85 PCM patients with a mean follow-up of 41 months. C-kit immunoreactivity was detected in 24 (28.2%) of the 85 cases and it was significantly associated with a high microvessel density, but not with traditional clinicopathological characteristics or with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that immunohistochemistry is a reliable indicator of c-kit gene expression and reinforce the notion that approximately one-third of PCM express high levels of c-kit. The lack of association with traditional clinicopathological parameters and patient survival suggests that c-kit expression may not be an adjunct in predicting the clinical course of the disease.
The prevalence and clinical implications of c-kit expression in plasma cell myeloma / G. Pruneri, M. Ponzoni, A.J. Ferreri, M. Freschi, M. Tresoldi, L. Baldini, M. Mattioli, L. Agnelli, S. Govi, P. Mancuso, A. Agazzi, F. Bertolini, J. Peccatori, S. Bosari, U. Gianelli, G. Viale, A. Neri. - In: HISTOPATHOLOGY. - ISSN 0309-0167. - 48:5(2006 Apr), pp. 529-535.
The prevalence and clinical implications of c-kit expression in plasma cell myeloma
G. Pruneri;A.J. Ferreri;M. Freschi;L. Baldini;M. Mattioli;L. Agnelli;S. Govi;S. Bosari;U. Gianelli;G. Viale;A. Neri
2006
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the clinical implications of c-kit (CD117) expression in plasma cell myeloma (PCM). METHODS AND RESULTS: We first evaluated the reliability of immunohistochemistry in assessing c-kit expression by comparing the results with those obtained by flow cytometry and gene expression arrays in 22 PCM and in 10 PCM cell lines. Immunohistochemical results showed a perfect concordance with those of flow cytometry; likewise, immunohistochemical and gene expression data were also concordant in all but one PCM and cell lines analysed. Then, we investigated the clinical implications of c-kit immunoreactivity in bone marrow biopsies of 85 PCM patients with a mean follow-up of 41 months. C-kit immunoreactivity was detected in 24 (28.2%) of the 85 cases and it was significantly associated with a high microvessel density, but not with traditional clinicopathological characteristics or with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that immunohistochemistry is a reliable indicator of c-kit gene expression and reinforce the notion that approximately one-third of PCM express high levels of c-kit. The lack of association with traditional clinicopathological parameters and patient survival suggests that c-kit expression may not be an adjunct in predicting the clinical course of the disease.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.