The main aim of this paper is to demonstrate the need for a clarification of the concept of speciesism and of its connections with anthropocentrism. I argue that ontological, epistemological, and ethical anthropocentrism are related, but still independent from each other. I also show how speciesism is only a kind of ethical anthropocentrism. I claim that in order to move towards a coherent and effective animal ethic we need to reassess the problem in terms of non-anthropocentric ethic.

Discordant notes. Comments on anthropocentrism and speciesism in animal ethics / M. Andreozzi. - In: ANIMAL STUDIES. - ISSN 2281-2288. - 3:7(2014 Jul 01), pp. 65-78.

Discordant notes. Comments on anthropocentrism and speciesism in animal ethics.

M. Andreozzi
2014

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to demonstrate the need for a clarification of the concept of speciesism and of its connections with anthropocentrism. I argue that ontological, epistemological, and ethical anthropocentrism are related, but still independent from each other. I also show how speciesism is only a kind of ethical anthropocentrism. I claim that in order to move towards a coherent and effective animal ethic we need to reassess the problem in terms of non-anthropocentric ethic.
metaethics ; anthropocentrism ; speciesism ; moral value ; moral status
Settore M-FIL/03 - Filosofia Morale
1-lug-2014
http://www.novalogos.it/prod.php?id=58
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Note Stonate - Pubblicato.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 489.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
489.55 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/237364
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact