The perception of humans and of the interaction with them was shown to have a major impact on horse welfare and safety of people. The aim of the study was to evaluate if trained assessors agree in their evaluation of human-horse relationship tests. Four observers with no experience in assessing equine welfare were trained to perform and score 3 standardized human-horse behavioural tests derived from literature: a modified Avoidance Distance test (AD), a modified Voluntary Animal Approach test (VAA) and a modified Forced Human Approach test (FHA). Tests were performed in the home box. A scoring system for each test was developed. Training procedure of observers consisted of giving a detailed verbal explanation of each test and scoring system, using PPT presentations with photographs and a written training guide, practical trials (video and live).They then conducted live assessments, paired with the trainer (silver standard), until each assessor consolidated his/her experience through applying the tests and the scoring system to a minimum of 5 correct repetitions in a row. After a final exam, the assessors tested 184 horses of 6 different stables, aged between 3 and 35 years (mean=10,3yrs). Assessors worked in pairs: each horse was scored live by the assessor performing the test and the other assessor observing from a distance. Observers did not talk or discuss during assessments. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W) for k related samples from a continuous field and Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were calculated to measure inter-observer reliability. Observers significantly agreed scoring Avoidance Distance test (W<0.05),Voluntary Animal Approach test (W<0.05; ICC=0.94) and Forced Human Approach test (ICC=0.93). Our results clearly show that inter-observer reliability in scoring human-horse behavioural tests can be achieved. Sufficient theoretical and practical training of assessors should be taken into consideration for developing standardized human-horse relationship tests.

Inter-observer reliability of three human-horse relationship tests / E. Dalla Costa, C. Bonaita, S. Pedretti, E. Govoni, A. Guzzeloni, E. Canali, M. Minero. ((Intervento presentato al 1. convegno AWIN annual conference tenutosi a Oscarsborg nel 2012.

Inter-observer reliability of three human-horse relationship tests

E. Dalla Costa
Primo
;
E. Canali
Secondo
;
M. Minero
Ultimo
2012

Abstract

The perception of humans and of the interaction with them was shown to have a major impact on horse welfare and safety of people. The aim of the study was to evaluate if trained assessors agree in their evaluation of human-horse relationship tests. Four observers with no experience in assessing equine welfare were trained to perform and score 3 standardized human-horse behavioural tests derived from literature: a modified Avoidance Distance test (AD), a modified Voluntary Animal Approach test (VAA) and a modified Forced Human Approach test (FHA). Tests were performed in the home box. A scoring system for each test was developed. Training procedure of observers consisted of giving a detailed verbal explanation of each test and scoring system, using PPT presentations with photographs and a written training guide, practical trials (video and live).They then conducted live assessments, paired with the trainer (silver standard), until each assessor consolidated his/her experience through applying the tests and the scoring system to a minimum of 5 correct repetitions in a row. After a final exam, the assessors tested 184 horses of 6 different stables, aged between 3 and 35 years (mean=10,3yrs). Assessors worked in pairs: each horse was scored live by the assessor performing the test and the other assessor observing from a distance. Observers did not talk or discuss during assessments. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W) for k related samples from a continuous field and Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were calculated to measure inter-observer reliability. Observers significantly agreed scoring Avoidance Distance test (W<0.05),Voluntary Animal Approach test (W<0.05; ICC=0.94) and Forced Human Approach test (ICC=0.93). Our results clearly show that inter-observer reliability in scoring human-horse behavioural tests can be achieved. Sufficient theoretical and practical training of assessors should be taken into consideration for developing standardized human-horse relationship tests.
mag-2012
Settore AGR/19 - Zootecnica Speciale
Inter-observer reliability of three human-horse relationship tests / E. Dalla Costa, C. Bonaita, S. Pedretti, E. Govoni, A. Guzzeloni, E. Canali, M. Minero. ((Intervento presentato al 1. convegno AWIN annual conference tenutosi a Oscarsborg nel 2012.
Conference Object
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/237194
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact