Among the spaces inhabited and crossed by spies and spy stories, that of the museum is certainly one of the most intriguing. This essay analyses different spy figures who, for very different reasons and in very different contexts (both real and fictitious), have related with museums: Sir Anthony Blunt, the connoisseur working in disguise for KGB in Alan Bennett’s play "A Question of Attribution" (1988), and the Russian secret agents working in an operation’s room hidden in the basement of the Hermitage museum in St. Petersburg in the spy story "Op-Center. Mirror Image" (1981) by Tom Clancy and Steve Pieczenik, written by Jeff Rovin. There are many reasons for this fortunate marriage between museums and espionage. First of all, the fact that museums prioritize the visual experience make them a very pregnant metaphor for espionage activity, based on observation and control and on tools such as binoculars, magnifying glasses and miniature cameras. Secondly, like the world of espionage, museums are places of danger and ambush, where nothing is what it seems and where it is difficult to make out real from fake. Furthermore, the methods of investigations of the spy are very similar to the art of connoisseurship of the art historian.

Spie al museo / M. Cavecchi. - In: ALTRE MODERNITÀ. - ISSN 2035-7680. - n. 11:(2014 May), pp. 21-36. [10.13130/2035-7680/4041]

Spie al museo

M. Cavecchi
2014

Abstract

Among the spaces inhabited and crossed by spies and spy stories, that of the museum is certainly one of the most intriguing. This essay analyses different spy figures who, for very different reasons and in very different contexts (both real and fictitious), have related with museums: Sir Anthony Blunt, the connoisseur working in disguise for KGB in Alan Bennett’s play "A Question of Attribution" (1988), and the Russian secret agents working in an operation’s room hidden in the basement of the Hermitage museum in St. Petersburg in the spy story "Op-Center. Mirror Image" (1981) by Tom Clancy and Steve Pieczenik, written by Jeff Rovin. There are many reasons for this fortunate marriage between museums and espionage. First of all, the fact that museums prioritize the visual experience make them a very pregnant metaphor for espionage activity, based on observation and control and on tools such as binoculars, magnifying glasses and miniature cameras. Secondly, like the world of espionage, museums are places of danger and ambush, where nothing is what it seems and where it is difficult to make out real from fake. Furthermore, the methods of investigations of the spy are very similar to the art of connoisseurship of the art historian.
Spionaggio ; teatro ; museo ; Alan Bennett ; Jeff Rovin
Settore L-LIN/10 - Letteratura Inglese
Settore L-ART/05 - Discipline Dello Spettacolo
mag-2014
http://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/AMonline/article/view/4041
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Spi al museo.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 272.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
272.73 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/236354
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact