No normative data are available for the latencies of the EMG signals from the ankle muscles in response to sudden sagittal tilt (toes-UP or toes-DOWN) or shift (shift-FOR or shift-BACK) of the support surface during standing. In this study the postural evoked response (PER) paradigm on the EquiTest™ force platform was applied to 31 healthy adults (18 women and 13 men; mean age 29. years). The EMG latencies (PEREMG) were computed both through the standard manual procedure and through a specially designed automated algorithm. The manually computed PEREMG onset yielded a 95% tolerance interval between 82 ms and 148 ms after toes-UP perturbation, between 93 ms and 182 ms after toes-DOWN perturbation, between 67 ms and 107 ms after shift-BACK perturbation, and between 73 ms and 113 ms after shift-FOR perturbation. When comparing the two methods, paired t-tests showed no significant mean difference (Bonferroni-adjusted p-values ranged from 0.440 to 1.000) and all Bland-Altman plots included zero difference within the limits of agreement. Therefore, the manual and the automated methods appear to be sufficiently consistent. These results foster the clinical application of PEREMG testing on the EquiTest platform.

Electromyographic latency of postural evoked responses from the leg muscles during EquiTest computerised dynamic posturography : reference data on healthy subjects / L. Perucca, A. Caronni, G. Vidmar, L. Tesio. - In: JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY. - ISSN 1050-6411. - 24:1(2014 Feb), pp. 126-133. [10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.10.009]

Electromyographic latency of postural evoked responses from the leg muscles during EquiTest computerised dynamic posturography : reference data on healthy subjects

L. Perucca
Primo
;
A. Caronni
;
L. Tesio
Ultimo
2014-02

Abstract

No normative data are available for the latencies of the EMG signals from the ankle muscles in response to sudden sagittal tilt (toes-UP or toes-DOWN) or shift (shift-FOR or shift-BACK) of the support surface during standing. In this study the postural evoked response (PER) paradigm on the EquiTest™ force platform was applied to 31 healthy adults (18 women and 13 men; mean age 29. years). The EMG latencies (PEREMG) were computed both through the standard manual procedure and through a specially designed automated algorithm. The manually computed PEREMG onset yielded a 95% tolerance interval between 82 ms and 148 ms after toes-UP perturbation, between 93 ms and 182 ms after toes-DOWN perturbation, between 67 ms and 107 ms after shift-BACK perturbation, and between 73 ms and 113 ms after shift-FOR perturbation. When comparing the two methods, paired t-tests showed no significant mean difference (Bonferroni-adjusted p-values ranged from 0.440 to 1.000) and all Bland-Altman plots included zero difference within the limits of agreement. Therefore, the manual and the automated methods appear to be sufficiently consistent. These results foster the clinical application of PEREMG testing on the EquiTest platform.
EMG; equiTest; human; normative data; postural evoked responses; posture
Settore MED/34 - Medicina Fisica e Riabilitativa
Settore MED/33 - Malattie Apparato Locomotore
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
J Emg Kinesiol_2014_24_126–133.pdf

accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo in rivista
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.23 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.23 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2434/235779
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact