In my paper I investigate collective intentionality (CI ) through the “Ought” implies “Can” (OIC ) principle. My leading question is does OIC impose any further requirement on CI ? In answering the challenge inside a Searlean framework, I realize that we need to clarify what CI 's structure is and what kind of role the agents joining a CI -act have. In the last part of the paper, I put forward an (inverted) Hartian framework to allow the Searlean CI theory to be agent sensitive and cope with the problems that emerged.
The "Ought'' Implies "Can'' Principle : A Challenge to Collective Intentionality / G. Feis. - In: PHENOMENOLOGY AND MIND. - ISSN 2280-7853. - 2(2012), pp. 114-121.
Titolo: | The "Ought'' Implies "Can'' Principle : A Challenge to Collective Intentionality |
Autori: | FEIS, GUGLIELMO (Corresponding) |
Parole Chiave: | collective intentionality ; ought implies can ; John Searle |
Settore Scientifico Disciplinare: | Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia del Diritto Settore M-FIL/05 - Filosofia e Teoria dei Linguaggi |
Data di pubblicazione: | 2012 |
Rivista: | |
URL: | http://www.phenomenologyandmind.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Feis.pdf |
Tipologia: | Article (author) |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 01 - Articolo su periodico |