In my paper I investigate collective intentionality (CI ) through the “Ought” implies “Can” (OIC ) principle. My leading question is does OIC impose any further requirement on CI ? In answering the challenge inside a Searlean framework, I realize that we need to clarify what CI 's structure is and what kind of role the agents joining a CI -act have. In the last part of the paper, I put forward an (inverted) Hartian framework to allow the Searlean CI theory to be agent sensitive and cope with the problems that emerged.

The "Ought'' Implies "Can'' Principle : A Challenge to Collective Intentionality / G. Feis. - In: PHENOMENOLOGY AND MIND. - ISSN 2280-7853. - 2:(2012), pp. 114-121.

The "Ought'' Implies "Can'' Principle : A Challenge to Collective Intentionality

G. Feis
2012

Abstract

In my paper I investigate collective intentionality (CI ) through the “Ought” implies “Can” (OIC ) principle. My leading question is does OIC impose any further requirement on CI ? In answering the challenge inside a Searlean framework, I realize that we need to clarify what CI 's structure is and what kind of role the agents joining a CI -act have. In the last part of the paper, I put forward an (inverted) Hartian framework to allow the Searlean CI theory to be agent sensitive and cope with the problems that emerged.
collective intentionality ; ought implies can ; John Searle
Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia del Diritto
Settore M-FIL/05 - Filosofia e Teoria dei Linguaggi
2012
http://www.phenomenologyandmind.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Feis.pdf
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/234268
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact