BACKGROUND: The prognostic implications of internal mammary (IM) and supraclavicular (SC) node involvement in locally advanced breast cancer is still unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 107 patients with IM (n = 65) or SC (n = 42) node involvement who underwent operation at the European Institute of Oncology between 1997 and 2009 to assess their prognostic features. We subsequently analyzed matched cohorts, using the 107 patients as cases and another group of patients as a control cohort, to evaluate prognostic differences between patients with and those without IM or SC node involvement. RESULTS: Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 84% in IM vs. 38.8% in SC node involvement (P < .0001), and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 96.9% in IM node vs. 57.1% in SC node involvement (P < .0001). No difference in outcome was found between patients with and controls without IM node involvement. Conversely, a statistically significant difference in DFS and locoregional recurrence was observed in patients with SC node involvement compared with controls without SC node involvement. CONCLUSION: SC node involvement correlated with a significantly poorer outcome in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Adequate staging, including biopsy of suspicious locoregional ipsilateral lymph nodes, is mandatory in these patients. Patients with IM or SC node involvement should be treated with curative intent using combined-modality treatments.

Outcomes of patients with breast cancer who present with ipsilateral supraclavicular or internal mammary lymph node metastases / S. Dellapasqua, V. Bagnardi, A. Balduzzi, M. Iorfida, N. Rotmensz, B. Santillo, G. Viale, R. Ghisini, P. Veronesi, A. Luini, A. Morra, A. Goldhirsch, M. Colleoni. - In: CLINICAL BREAST CANCER. - ISSN 1526-8209. - 14:1(2014 Feb), pp. 53-60. [10.1016/j.clbc.2013.09.008]

Outcomes of patients with breast cancer who present with ipsilateral supraclavicular or internal mammary lymph node metastases

G. Viale;P. Veronesi;
2014

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic implications of internal mammary (IM) and supraclavicular (SC) node involvement in locally advanced breast cancer is still unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 107 patients with IM (n = 65) or SC (n = 42) node involvement who underwent operation at the European Institute of Oncology between 1997 and 2009 to assess their prognostic features. We subsequently analyzed matched cohorts, using the 107 patients as cases and another group of patients as a control cohort, to evaluate prognostic differences between patients with and those without IM or SC node involvement. RESULTS: Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 84% in IM vs. 38.8% in SC node involvement (P < .0001), and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 96.9% in IM node vs. 57.1% in SC node involvement (P < .0001). No difference in outcome was found between patients with and controls without IM node involvement. Conversely, a statistically significant difference in DFS and locoregional recurrence was observed in patients with SC node involvement compared with controls without SC node involvement. CONCLUSION: SC node involvement correlated with a significantly poorer outcome in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Adequate staging, including biopsy of suspicious locoregional ipsilateral lymph nodes, is mandatory in these patients. Patients with IM or SC node involvement should be treated with curative intent using combined-modality treatments.
Breast cancer; Internal mammary chain; Supraclavicular lymph nodes
Settore MED/08 - Anatomia Patologica
Settore MED/18 - Chirurgia Generale
feb-2014
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S1526820913002218-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 614.38 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
614.38 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/230126
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 16
  • Scopus 27
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact