Introduction and aims. Balanced propofol sedation (BPS) administered by gastroenterologists has gained popularity in endoscopic procedures. Few studies exist about the safety of this approach during endosonography with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). We assessed the safety of BPS in EUS-FNA. Materials and methods. 112 consecutive patients, referred to our unit to perform EUS-FNA, from February 2008 to December 2009, were sedated with BPS. A second gastroenterologist administered the drugs and monitorized the patient. Results. All the 112 patients (62 males, mean age 58.35) completed the examination. The mean dose of midazolam and propofol was, respectively, of 2.1 mg (range 1-4 mg) and 350 mg (range 180-400). All patients received oxygen with a mean flux of 4 liter/minute (range 2-6 liters/minute). The mean recovery time after procedure was 25 minutes (range 18-45 minutes). No major complications related to sedation were registered during all procedures. The oxygen saturation of all patients never reduced to less than 85%. Blood systolic pressure during and after the procedure never reduced to less than 100 mmHg. Conclusions. In our experience BPS administered by non-anaesthesiologists provided safe and successful sedation in patients undergoing EUS-FNA.

Balanced poropofol sedation in patients undergoing EUS-FNA: a pilot study to assess feasibility and safety / N. Pagano, M. Arosio, F. Romeo, G. Rando, G. Del Conte, A. Carlino, G. Strangio, E. Vitetta, A. Malesci, A. Repici. - In: DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 1070-3608. - 2011:(2011), pp. 542159.1-542159.5. [10.1155/2011/542159]

Balanced poropofol sedation in patients undergoing EUS-FNA: a pilot study to assess feasibility and safety

G. Del Conte;A. Malesci
Penultimo
;
2011

Abstract

Introduction and aims. Balanced propofol sedation (BPS) administered by gastroenterologists has gained popularity in endoscopic procedures. Few studies exist about the safety of this approach during endosonography with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). We assessed the safety of BPS in EUS-FNA. Materials and methods. 112 consecutive patients, referred to our unit to perform EUS-FNA, from February 2008 to December 2009, were sedated with BPS. A second gastroenterologist administered the drugs and monitorized the patient. Results. All the 112 patients (62 males, mean age 58.35) completed the examination. The mean dose of midazolam and propofol was, respectively, of 2.1 mg (range 1-4 mg) and 350 mg (range 180-400). All patients received oxygen with a mean flux of 4 liter/minute (range 2-6 liters/minute). The mean recovery time after procedure was 25 minutes (range 18-45 minutes). No major complications related to sedation were registered during all procedures. The oxygen saturation of all patients never reduced to less than 85%. Blood systolic pressure during and after the procedure never reduced to less than 100 mmHg. Conclusions. In our experience BPS administered by non-anaesthesiologists provided safe and successful sedation in patients undergoing EUS-FNA.
Radiology; Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Settore MED/12 - Gastroenterologia
Settore MED/09 - Medicina Interna
2011
12-lug-2011
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
542159.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.97 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.97 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/226335
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact