Purpose: To investigate gender differences in clinicopathological features and to analyze the prognostic impact of gender in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients undergoing surgery. Methods: A total of 6,234 patients (eleven centers; Europe and USA) treated by radical or partial nephrectomy were included in this retrospective study (median follow-up 59 months; IQR 30-106). Gender differences in clinicopathological parameters were assessed. Multivariable Cox regression models were applied to determine the influence of parameters on disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 3,751 patients of the study group were male patients (60.2 %), who were significantly younger at diagnosis and received more frequently NSS than women. Significantly, more often high-grade tumors and simultaneous metastasis were present in men. Whereas tumor size and pTN stages did not differ between genders, clear-cell and chromophobe RCC was diagnosed less frequently, but papillary RCC more often in men. Gender also independently influenced DSS (HR 0.75, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.80, p < 0.001) with a benefit for women. However, inclusion of gender in multivariable models did not significantly gain predictive accuracies (PA) for DSS (0.868-0.870, p = 0.628) and OS (0.775-0.777, p = 0.522). Furthermore, no significantly different DSS and OS rates were found in patients undergoing NSS. Conclusions: This study demonstrates important gender differences in clinicopathological features and outcome of RCC patients with improved DSS and OS for women compared to men, even if solely patients with clear-cell RCC or M0-stage are taken into evaluation. However, inclusion of gender in multivariable models does not significantly gain PA of multivariable models.

Gender differences in clinicopathological features and survuval in surgically treated patints with renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of the multicenter CORONA database / M. May, A. Aziz, R. Zigeuner, T. Chromecki, L. Cindolo, L. Schips, O. De Cobelli, B. Rocco, C. De Nunzio, A. Tubaro, I. Coman, M. Truss, O. Dalpiaz, B. Hoschke, C. Gilfrich, B. Feciche, A. Stoltze, F. Fenske, H.M. Fritsche, R.S. Figenshau, K. Madison, M. Sanchez-Chapado, M.D. Martin, L. Salzano, G. Lotrechiano, S. Joniau, R. Waidelich, C. Stief, S. Brookman-May. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY. - ISSN 0724-4983. - 31:5(2013), pp. 1073-1080.

Gender differences in clinicopathological features and survuval in surgically treated patints with renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of the multicenter CORONA database

O. De Cobelli;B. Rocco;
2013

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate gender differences in clinicopathological features and to analyze the prognostic impact of gender in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients undergoing surgery. Methods: A total of 6,234 patients (eleven centers; Europe and USA) treated by radical or partial nephrectomy were included in this retrospective study (median follow-up 59 months; IQR 30-106). Gender differences in clinicopathological parameters were assessed. Multivariable Cox regression models were applied to determine the influence of parameters on disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 3,751 patients of the study group were male patients (60.2 %), who were significantly younger at diagnosis and received more frequently NSS than women. Significantly, more often high-grade tumors and simultaneous metastasis were present in men. Whereas tumor size and pTN stages did not differ between genders, clear-cell and chromophobe RCC was diagnosed less frequently, but papillary RCC more often in men. Gender also independently influenced DSS (HR 0.75, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.80, p < 0.001) with a benefit for women. However, inclusion of gender in multivariable models did not significantly gain predictive accuracies (PA) for DSS (0.868-0.870, p = 0.628) and OS (0.775-0.777, p = 0.522). Furthermore, no significantly different DSS and OS rates were found in patients undergoing NSS. Conclusions: This study demonstrates important gender differences in clinicopathological features and outcome of RCC patients with improved DSS and OS for women compared to men, even if solely patients with clear-cell RCC or M0-stage are taken into evaluation. However, inclusion of gender in multivariable models does not significantly gain PA of multivariable models.
English
Age groups; Gender; Histological subtypes; Nephrectomy; Prognosis; Renal cell carcinoma
Settore MED/24 - Urologia
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Pubblicazione scientifica
2013
Springer
31
5
1073
1080
8
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Gender differences in clinicopathological features and survuval in surgically treated patints with renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of the multicenter CORONA database / M. May, A. Aziz, R. Zigeuner, T. Chromecki, L. Cindolo, L. Schips, O. De Cobelli, B. Rocco, C. De Nunzio, A. Tubaro, I. Coman, M. Truss, O. Dalpiaz, B. Hoschke, C. Gilfrich, B. Feciche, A. Stoltze, F. Fenske, H.M. Fritsche, R.S. Figenshau, K. Madison, M. Sanchez-Chapado, M.D. Martin, L. Salzano, G. Lotrechiano, S. Joniau, R. Waidelich, C. Stief, S. Brookman-May. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY. - ISSN 0724-4983. - 31:5(2013), pp. 1073-1080.
none
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
29
262
Article (author)
si
M. May, A. Aziz, R. Zigeuner, T. Chromecki, L. Cindolo, L. Schips, O. De Cobelli, B. Rocco, C. De Nunzio, A. Tubaro, I. Coman, M. Truss, O. Dalpiaz, B. Hoschke, C. Gilfrich, B. Feciche, A. Stoltze, F. Fenske, H.M. Fritsche, R.S. Figenshau, K. Madison, M. Sanchez-Chapado, M.D. Martin, L. Salzano, G. Lotrechiano, S. Joniau, R. Waidelich, C. Stief, S. Brookman-May
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/219726
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 37
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact