Background: Direct plasma renin concentration determined with chemiluminometric immunoassay (CliR, mU/l) is progressively replacing plasma renin activity (PRA, ng/ml/h) for clinical use but the conversion factors (CF) between the two methods are still unsettled as well as their influence on the calculation of aldosterone/renin ratio (ARRD and ARRP). Methods: CliR, PRA and aldosterone (A, ng/dl) were measured in plasma samples collected in the supine position (S) and after 1 hour of active standing (AS) in 88 patients with essential hypertension (EH) on treatment with various antihypertensive drugs including ACEIs and ARBs. The same determinations were made in S in 10 patients with primary hyperaldosteronism (PHA) due to adrenal adenoma histologically confirmed. Results: In EH the median values (range) of CliR in S and AS were 18 (2-255) and 28 (4-471) respectively, the corresponding values of PRA being 0.6 (0.2-11.2) and 1.3 (0.3-16.0). Supine and upright CliR and PRA were highly correlated with a Spearman rs of 0.85 and 0.84 respectively. The linear non parametric Passing-Bablok regression on all logarithmic values in S and AS gave a slope of 1.01, an intercept of 3.2 and a CF of 24.6 between PRA and CliR on the natural scale. In EH the median values (range) of A in S and AS were 7.8 (0.3-31) and 18.4 (2.3-60). In PHA patients the median values of CliR, PRA and A in S were 0.8 (0.2-10.2), 0.1 (0.1-0.6) and 36.8 (11.8-122). In EH the median values of ARRD in S and AS were 0.4 (0.01-3) and 0.5 (0.02-7.8) respectively, the corresponding values of ARRP being 12 (0-71) and 13 (0-80). ARRD and ARRP were strongly correlated, with an rs of 0.88 and 0.92 in S and AS respectively. The regression analysis of all logarithmic values in S and AS showed a slope of 1.12, an intercept of -3.53 and a CF of 0.03 between ARRP and ARRD on the natural scale. In PHA patients the median value of ARRD in S was 34 (2.8-244) and that of ARRP 298 (48-1222). Assuming as cut-off values of normalcy those recommended by guidelines (Funder et al, JCEM 2008; 93: 3266) i.e. 30 for ARRP and 3.7 for ARRD, there were 13 false positives in S and 18 in AS for ARRP with a specificity of 0.85 (CI95% 0.76-0.92) and of 0.78 (0.68-0.87) respectively while with ARRD there were only 0 and 4 false positives with a specificity of 1 (0.96-1) and of 0.95 (0.88-0.99). Conclusions: In EH on treatment CliR and PRA, as well as ARRD and ARRP, are highly correlated. However, using the conventional cut-off values, for the diagnosis of PHA the specificity of ARRD is better than that of ARRP. Moreover the specificity of ARRD appears to be minimally affected by antihypertensive treatment.
DOSAGGIO DIRETTO DELLA RENINA CON METODICA CHEMILUMINOMETRICA:CONFRONTO CON LA TECNICA ENZIMATICA ED UTILIZZO NELLO SCREENINGDELL¿IPERALDOSTERONISMO PRIMITIVO / C. Lonati ; tutor: A. Morganti ; coordinatore: R. L. Weinstein. DIPARTIMENTO DI SCIENZE BIOMEDICHE PER LA SALUTE, 2013 Feb 27. 25. ciclo, Anno Accademico 2012. [10.13130/lonati-chiara_phd2013-02-27].
DOSAGGIO DIRETTO DELLA RENINA CON METODICA CHEMILUMINOMETRICA:CONFRONTO CON LA TECNICA ENZIMATICA ED UTILIZZO NELLO SCREENINGDELL¿IPERALDOSTERONISMO PRIMITIVO
C. Lonati
2013
Abstract
Background: Direct plasma renin concentration determined with chemiluminometric immunoassay (CliR, mU/l) is progressively replacing plasma renin activity (PRA, ng/ml/h) for clinical use but the conversion factors (CF) between the two methods are still unsettled as well as their influence on the calculation of aldosterone/renin ratio (ARRD and ARRP). Methods: CliR, PRA and aldosterone (A, ng/dl) were measured in plasma samples collected in the supine position (S) and after 1 hour of active standing (AS) in 88 patients with essential hypertension (EH) on treatment with various antihypertensive drugs including ACEIs and ARBs. The same determinations were made in S in 10 patients with primary hyperaldosteronism (PHA) due to adrenal adenoma histologically confirmed. Results: In EH the median values (range) of CliR in S and AS were 18 (2-255) and 28 (4-471) respectively, the corresponding values of PRA being 0.6 (0.2-11.2) and 1.3 (0.3-16.0). Supine and upright CliR and PRA were highly correlated with a Spearman rs of 0.85 and 0.84 respectively. The linear non parametric Passing-Bablok regression on all logarithmic values in S and AS gave a slope of 1.01, an intercept of 3.2 and a CF of 24.6 between PRA and CliR on the natural scale. In EH the median values (range) of A in S and AS were 7.8 (0.3-31) and 18.4 (2.3-60). In PHA patients the median values of CliR, PRA and A in S were 0.8 (0.2-10.2), 0.1 (0.1-0.6) and 36.8 (11.8-122). In EH the median values of ARRD in S and AS were 0.4 (0.01-3) and 0.5 (0.02-7.8) respectively, the corresponding values of ARRP being 12 (0-71) and 13 (0-80). ARRD and ARRP were strongly correlated, with an rs of 0.88 and 0.92 in S and AS respectively. The regression analysis of all logarithmic values in S and AS showed a slope of 1.12, an intercept of -3.53 and a CF of 0.03 between ARRP and ARRD on the natural scale. In PHA patients the median value of ARRD in S was 34 (2.8-244) and that of ARRP 298 (48-1222). Assuming as cut-off values of normalcy those recommended by guidelines (Funder et al, JCEM 2008; 93: 3266) i.e. 30 for ARRP and 3.7 for ARRD, there were 13 false positives in S and 18 in AS for ARRP with a specificity of 0.85 (CI95% 0.76-0.92) and of 0.78 (0.68-0.87) respectively while with ARRD there were only 0 and 4 false positives with a specificity of 1 (0.96-1) and of 0.95 (0.88-0.99). Conclusions: In EH on treatment CliR and PRA, as well as ARRD and ARRP, are highly correlated. However, using the conventional cut-off values, for the diagnosis of PHA the specificity of ARRD is better than that of ARRP. Moreover the specificity of ARRD appears to be minimally affected by antihypertensive treatment.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
phd_unimi_R08593.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Tesi di dottorato completa
Dimensione
1.03 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.03 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.