INTRODUCTION. Burnout syndrome was defined as a whole of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and reduced personal accomplishment, that may occur among individuals who work in direct touch with people, and that may lead to a decreased working yield. Aim of the study was to analyze burnout syndrome within nursing staff working in Intensive Care Units (ICUs), and to compare nurses with an high and a low level of burnout. METHODS. We studied a population of 883 nurses working in ICUs, distributed in 79 Italian hospitals. We asked them to fill in a form including: 1) general data and his/her work environment, 2) different evaluation standardized scales: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, divided in anxiety (HAD A) and depression (HAD D) status – 0-10 “non pathologic”, 11-21 “pathologic” –; the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (S.T.A.I.), divided in acute anxiety (Y-1) and chronic anxiety (Y-2) status; the Maslach Burnout Inventory – (M.B.I.) divided in Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalization (DP) and Personal Accomplishment (PA). High level of burnout was defined as a value of EE 27, DP 10 and PA 33, while low level was defined as a value of EE 18, DP 5 and PA 40. The comparison between the two groups was performed by t-test and z-test; statistical significance was accepted as p < 0.05. Results are expressed as percentage or as mean  SD. RESULTS. Among our population, 12.5% of nurses resulted to have a low level of burnout, and 10% to have an high level of burnout, while 77.5% of nurses presented at least one variables of burnout above low level. In nursing staff with high level of burnout, compared with nurses with low level of burnout, we found: an higher percentage of nurses working in ICU for more than 2 years (89% vs 68%), an higher mean of intubated patients (5.7 ±2.9 vs 3.8 ±2.8), an higher percentage of pathologic anxiety (42% vs 3%) and pathologic depression (14% vs 0%), and an higher mean of S.T.A.I. Y-1 (45.4 ±11.7 vs 30.4 ±5.4) and S.T.A.I. Y-2 (46.7 ±9.1 vs 31.4 ±7.0). Moreover, in nurses with high level of burnout EE was correlated with S.T.A.I. Y-1 (r = 0.54, p < 0.001) and with HAD A (r = 0.51, p < 0.001), and HAD A was correlated with HAD D (r = 0.63, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION. 1) Burnout syndrome may be an important phenomenon within ICU nursing staff. 2) Some features of working environment, general and psychological personal data may be associated with the degree of burnout.

BURNOUT SYNDROME IN ICU NURSING STAFF / P. Pelosi, P. Caironi, S. Losappio, R. Malacrida, M. Tomamichel, L. Gattinoni. - In: INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE. - ISSN 0342-4642. - 2000:26(2000), pp. S383-S383. ((Intervento presentato al 13. convegno European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, Annual Congress tenutosi a Roma nel 2000.

BURNOUT SYNDROME IN ICU NURSING STAFF

P. Caironi
Secondo
;
L. Gattinoni
Ultimo
2000

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. Burnout syndrome was defined as a whole of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and reduced personal accomplishment, that may occur among individuals who work in direct touch with people, and that may lead to a decreased working yield. Aim of the study was to analyze burnout syndrome within nursing staff working in Intensive Care Units (ICUs), and to compare nurses with an high and a low level of burnout. METHODS. We studied a population of 883 nurses working in ICUs, distributed in 79 Italian hospitals. We asked them to fill in a form including: 1) general data and his/her work environment, 2) different evaluation standardized scales: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, divided in anxiety (HAD A) and depression (HAD D) status – 0-10 “non pathologic”, 11-21 “pathologic” –; the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (S.T.A.I.), divided in acute anxiety (Y-1) and chronic anxiety (Y-2) status; the Maslach Burnout Inventory – (M.B.I.) divided in Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalization (DP) and Personal Accomplishment (PA). High level of burnout was defined as a value of EE 27, DP 10 and PA 33, while low level was defined as a value of EE 18, DP 5 and PA 40. The comparison between the two groups was performed by t-test and z-test; statistical significance was accepted as p < 0.05. Results are expressed as percentage or as mean  SD. RESULTS. Among our population, 12.5% of nurses resulted to have a low level of burnout, and 10% to have an high level of burnout, while 77.5% of nurses presented at least one variables of burnout above low level. In nursing staff with high level of burnout, compared with nurses with low level of burnout, we found: an higher percentage of nurses working in ICU for more than 2 years (89% vs 68%), an higher mean of intubated patients (5.7 ±2.9 vs 3.8 ±2.8), an higher percentage of pathologic anxiety (42% vs 3%) and pathologic depression (14% vs 0%), and an higher mean of S.T.A.I. Y-1 (45.4 ±11.7 vs 30.4 ±5.4) and S.T.A.I. Y-2 (46.7 ±9.1 vs 31.4 ±7.0). Moreover, in nurses with high level of burnout EE was correlated with S.T.A.I. Y-1 (r = 0.54, p < 0.001) and with HAD A (r = 0.51, p < 0.001), and HAD A was correlated with HAD D (r = 0.63, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION. 1) Burnout syndrome may be an important phenomenon within ICU nursing staff. 2) Some features of working environment, general and psychological personal data may be associated with the degree of burnout.
Settore MED/41 - Anestesiologia
2000
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/212399
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact