OBJECTIVES : Long-term results of posterior approach (PA) for the treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms are lacking in the literature. We compared our results with this access with those from a standard medial approach over a 13-years’ period. METHODS: Clinical data of all patients treated for a popliteal aneurysm between 2/1998 and 10/2011 were retrospectively reviewed and outcomes analyzed: Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank, chi2 and Wilcoxon test were employed for analysis. RESULTS : A total of 78 aneurysms were treated in 66 patients (65 men). Mean age was 68 years (range 48-96 years). Thirty-six aneurysms were asymptomatic (46%). Mean sac diameter was 2.9±1 cm. A PA was used in 43 cases (55%) and a medial approach (MA) in 35. All PA consisted in aneurysmectomy with an interposition graft with end to end anastomoses; among MA 25 interposition grafts and 10 bypass were performed. A PTFE graft was used mostly (57 cases). The two groups differed for age only (median 65.4 for PA vs. 72.9 for MA p=0.01). Five patients had an early thrombosis and required a Fogarty thrombectomy (2 PA and 3 MA, all PTFE grafts). Mortality rate at 30 days was 0%. One patient suffered a peroneal nerve lesion (permanent) and another one a major wound necrosis with tissue loss (both PA). There were no early amputations. Median follow-up was 58.8 months (range 5 days-166.7 months). Nine patients died during follow-up for unrelated causes. The 5-year primary and secondary patency rates were 58.9%±8,7% and 96.4%±3.5% respectively for PA, and 67.4%±10,4% and 81.3%±8,9% respectively for MA (p=0.41 for primary patency rate and 0.28 for secondary patency rate). Limb salvage was 100% and 93.3%±6.4% at 5 and 10 years respectively for PA and 91.5%±5.6% at both time points for MA (p=0.3). CONCLUSIONS : PA in our experience was burdened by a few more early complications compared to MA. However in the long term it provided results which compare favorably to MA. AUTHOR DISCLOSURES: I. Barbetta, Nothing to disclose; M. Carmo, Nothing to disclose; R. Dallatana, Nothing to disclose; G. Grava, Nothing to disclose; D. Mazzaccaro, Nothing to disclose; A. M. Settembrini, Nothing to disclose; P. Settembrini, Nothing to disclose.

Surgical Treatment of Popliteal Aneurysms Using a Posterior Approach : Thirteen Years’ Follow-up / D. Mazzaccaro, M. Carmo, G. Grava, A.M. Settembrini, R. Dallatana, I. Barbetta, P. Settembrini. ((Intervento presentato al convegno Vascular Annual Meeting tenutosi a Washington nel 2012.

Surgical Treatment of Popliteal Aneurysms Using a Posterior Approach : Thirteen Years’ Follow-up

D. Mazzaccaro
Primo
;
A.M. Settembrini;I. Barbetta
Penultimo
;
P. Settembrini
Ultimo
2012

Abstract

OBJECTIVES : Long-term results of posterior approach (PA) for the treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms are lacking in the literature. We compared our results with this access with those from a standard medial approach over a 13-years’ period. METHODS: Clinical data of all patients treated for a popliteal aneurysm between 2/1998 and 10/2011 were retrospectively reviewed and outcomes analyzed: Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank, chi2 and Wilcoxon test were employed for analysis. RESULTS : A total of 78 aneurysms were treated in 66 patients (65 men). Mean age was 68 years (range 48-96 years). Thirty-six aneurysms were asymptomatic (46%). Mean sac diameter was 2.9±1 cm. A PA was used in 43 cases (55%) and a medial approach (MA) in 35. All PA consisted in aneurysmectomy with an interposition graft with end to end anastomoses; among MA 25 interposition grafts and 10 bypass were performed. A PTFE graft was used mostly (57 cases). The two groups differed for age only (median 65.4 for PA vs. 72.9 for MA p=0.01). Five patients had an early thrombosis and required a Fogarty thrombectomy (2 PA and 3 MA, all PTFE grafts). Mortality rate at 30 days was 0%. One patient suffered a peroneal nerve lesion (permanent) and another one a major wound necrosis with tissue loss (both PA). There were no early amputations. Median follow-up was 58.8 months (range 5 days-166.7 months). Nine patients died during follow-up for unrelated causes. The 5-year primary and secondary patency rates were 58.9%±8,7% and 96.4%±3.5% respectively for PA, and 67.4%±10,4% and 81.3%±8,9% respectively for MA (p=0.41 for primary patency rate and 0.28 for secondary patency rate). Limb salvage was 100% and 93.3%±6.4% at 5 and 10 years respectively for PA and 91.5%±5.6% at both time points for MA (p=0.3). CONCLUSIONS : PA in our experience was burdened by a few more early complications compared to MA. However in the long term it provided results which compare favorably to MA. AUTHOR DISCLOSURES: I. Barbetta, Nothing to disclose; M. Carmo, Nothing to disclose; R. Dallatana, Nothing to disclose; G. Grava, Nothing to disclose; D. Mazzaccaro, Nothing to disclose; A. M. Settembrini, Nothing to disclose; P. Settembrini, Nothing to disclose.
giu-2012
popliteal aneurysm ; posterior approach ; PTFE prosthesis ; vein graft
Settore MED/22 - Chirurgia Vascolare
Surgical Treatment of Popliteal Aneurysms Using a Posterior Approach : Thirteen Years’ Follow-up / D. Mazzaccaro, M. Carmo, G. Grava, A.M. Settembrini, R. Dallatana, I. Barbetta, P. Settembrini. ((Intervento presentato al convegno Vascular Annual Meeting tenutosi a Washington nel 2012.
Conference Object
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/206721
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact