A total of 62 infertile women with a laparoscopic diagnosis of endometriosis were allocated randomly to two treatment groups, one of which (32 patients) received oral danazol 600 micrograms/day and the other (30 patients) received intranasal buserelin 1200 micrograms/day for 6 months. Suppression of serum levels of estradiol was greater with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment. Pain symptoms improved markedly during treatment in both groups. At the end of treatment a repeat laparoscopy was performed only in the patients who agreed to it (12 in the buserelin group and 13 in the danazol group), and it did not reveal significant differences in the effects of the two treatments on the endometriotic implants. All of the patients were followed up for at least 12 months, during which pregnancy was attempted. At 18 months the cumulative pregnancy rate was 48% in the patients treated with buserelin and 43% in those treated with danazol. Pain recurrence was observed in about half of the patients in each group 1 year after treatment suspension. The side effects were more frequent and more severe in the danazol-treated patients, whereas those given buserelin generally reported only symptoms of hypoestrogenism. The results of this study suggests that buserelin is at least as effective as danazol in the treatment of endometriosis when the outcome is considered in terms of restored fertility, and its side effects are less severe.

Buserelin versus danazol in the treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility / L. Fedele, S. Bianchi, L. Arcaini, P. Vercellini, G.B. Candiani. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY. - ISSN 0002-9378. - 161:4(1989 Oct), pp. 871-876. [10.1016/0002-9378(89)90739-4]

Buserelin versus danazol in the treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility

L. Fedele
Primo
;
S. Bianchi
Secondo
;
P. Vercellini
Penultimo
;
1989

Abstract

A total of 62 infertile women with a laparoscopic diagnosis of endometriosis were allocated randomly to two treatment groups, one of which (32 patients) received oral danazol 600 micrograms/day and the other (30 patients) received intranasal buserelin 1200 micrograms/day for 6 months. Suppression of serum levels of estradiol was greater with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment. Pain symptoms improved markedly during treatment in both groups. At the end of treatment a repeat laparoscopy was performed only in the patients who agreed to it (12 in the buserelin group and 13 in the danazol group), and it did not reveal significant differences in the effects of the two treatments on the endometriotic implants. All of the patients were followed up for at least 12 months, during which pregnancy was attempted. At 18 months the cumulative pregnancy rate was 48% in the patients treated with buserelin and 43% in those treated with danazol. Pain recurrence was observed in about half of the patients in each group 1 year after treatment suspension. The side effects were more frequent and more severe in the danazol-treated patients, whereas those given buserelin generally reported only symptoms of hypoestrogenism. The results of this study suggests that buserelin is at least as effective as danazol in the treatment of endometriosis when the outcome is considered in terms of restored fertility, and its side effects are less severe.
No
English
Buserelin ; Progesterone ; Random Allocation ; Laparoscopy ; Humans ; Pregnadienes ; Endometriosis ; Recurrence ; Estradiol ; Infertility, Female ; Danazol ; Adult ; Follow-Up Studies ; Menstruation ; Female
Settore MED/40 - Ginecologia e Ostetricia
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
ott-1989
161
4
871
876
6
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
Pubmed
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Buserelin versus danazol in the treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility / L. Fedele, S. Bianchi, L. Arcaini, P. Vercellini, G.B. Candiani. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY. - ISSN 0002-9378. - 161:4(1989 Oct), pp. 871-876. [10.1016/0002-9378(89)90739-4]
none
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
5
262
Article (author)
no
L. Fedele, S. Bianchi, L. Arcaini, P. Vercellini, G.B. Candiani
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/206125
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 54
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 47
social impact