Background: Recent international recommendations for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GD) were implemented in a university hospital. The aim was to audit the appropriateness of use of the new diagnostic approach. Methods: The same 5-month period, one before [2009, traditional two-step oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) approach, S1] and one after the implementation of new criteria (2010, S2) were compared. Results: In the two periods, 256 (S1) and 245 (S2) pregnant women were examined and 298 (50 g, n = 195; 100 g, n = 103) and 252 (75 g) OGTTs were, respectively, executed. In S1, 54 (27.7 % ) 50 g OGTTs resulted positive and 36 (66.7 % ) of those performed the 100 g OGTT. In addition, three (1.5 % of total) 50 g OGTT negative women were submitted to 100 g OGTT. Sixty-three women did 100 g OGTT only. In total, 14 (13.6 % ) 100 g OGTTs were positive. In S2, 38 (15.1 % ) 75 g OGTTs were positive. In women who did the complete protocol in the hospital, 98.3 % in S1 and 77.0 % in S2 performed the correct protocol (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In this hospital new recommendations for GD diagnosis are not correctly applied in 23 % of cases. The main issue seems to be the lack of consideration of the new threshold for fasting glycemia (5.1 mmol/L) as a main decisional driver for performing OGTT.

Implementation of new recommendations for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes : a 5 - month audit / D. Szoke, C. Valente, A. Dolci, M. Panteghini. - In: CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE. - ISSN 1434-6621. - 50:7(2012), pp. 1271-1273. [10.1515/CCLM.2011.757]

Implementation of new recommendations for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes : a 5 - month audit

A. Dolci;M. Panteghini
Ultimo
2012

Abstract

Background: Recent international recommendations for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GD) were implemented in a university hospital. The aim was to audit the appropriateness of use of the new diagnostic approach. Methods: The same 5-month period, one before [2009, traditional two-step oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) approach, S1] and one after the implementation of new criteria (2010, S2) were compared. Results: In the two periods, 256 (S1) and 245 (S2) pregnant women were examined and 298 (50 g, n = 195; 100 g, n = 103) and 252 (75 g) OGTTs were, respectively, executed. In S1, 54 (27.7 % ) 50 g OGTTs resulted positive and 36 (66.7 % ) of those performed the 100 g OGTT. In addition, three (1.5 % of total) 50 g OGTT negative women were submitted to 100 g OGTT. Sixty-three women did 100 g OGTT only. In total, 14 (13.6 % ) 100 g OGTTs were positive. In S2, 38 (15.1 % ) 75 g OGTTs were positive. In women who did the complete protocol in the hospital, 98.3 % in S1 and 77.0 % in S2 performed the correct protocol (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In this hospital new recommendations for GD diagnosis are not correctly applied in 23 % of cases. The main issue seems to be the lack of consideration of the new threshold for fasting glycemia (5.1 mmol/L) as a main decisional driver for performing OGTT.
Diagnosis; Gestational diabetes; New recommendations
Settore BIO/12 - Biochimica Clinica e Biologia Molecolare Clinica
2012
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/202920
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact