According to current opinion, surgery at laparotomy for conservative treatment of endometriosis is obsolete. The debate on the indications, modalities and results of surgical treatment for the most severe forms has recently been rekindled. Although some expert endoscopists propose advanced techniques to deal with the most problematic pelvic lesions, various authors wonder if such interventions have been demonstrated as efficacious and safe enough to justify abandoning the standard reference treatment. We have reviewed the data, comments and proposals recently published on the topic. The available scientific evidence appears insufficient to recommend laparoscopy instead of surgery at laparotomy, even for the most severe forms of endometriosis. Intestinal, vesical, periureteral, retroperitoneal, and vaginal lesions and large endometriomas associated with extensive dense adhesions may still benefit from classical surgery at laparotomy. However, the lack of comparative studies prevents a correct comparison of the methods in terms of pregnancy rate, resolution of pain and incidence of recurrences.

Conservative surgery for severe endometriosis: should laparotomy be abandoned definitively? / P. G. Crosignani, P. Vercellini. - In: HUMAN REPRODUCTION. - ISSN 0268-1161. - 10:9(1995 Sep), pp. 2412-2418. [10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136309]

Conservative surgery for severe endometriosis: should laparotomy be abandoned definitively?

P.G. Crosignani
Primo
;
P. Vercellini
Ultimo
1995

Abstract

According to current opinion, surgery at laparotomy for conservative treatment of endometriosis is obsolete. The debate on the indications, modalities and results of surgical treatment for the most severe forms has recently been rekindled. Although some expert endoscopists propose advanced techniques to deal with the most problematic pelvic lesions, various authors wonder if such interventions have been demonstrated as efficacious and safe enough to justify abandoning the standard reference treatment. We have reviewed the data, comments and proposals recently published on the topic. The available scientific evidence appears insufficient to recommend laparoscopy instead of surgery at laparotomy, even for the most severe forms of endometriosis. Intestinal, vesical, periureteral, retroperitoneal, and vaginal lesions and large endometriomas associated with extensive dense adhesions may still benefit from classical surgery at laparotomy. However, the lack of comparative studies prevents a correct comparison of the methods in terms of pregnancy rate, resolution of pain and incidence of recurrences.
No
English
Endometriosis; Infertility; Laparoscopy; Pelvic pain; Surgery
Settore MED/40 - Ginecologia e Ostetricia
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
set-1995
10
9
2412
2418
7
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
Pubmed
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Conservative surgery for severe endometriosis: should laparotomy be abandoned definitively? / P. G. Crosignani, P. Vercellini. - In: HUMAN REPRODUCTION. - ISSN 0268-1161. - 10:9(1995 Sep), pp. 2412-2418. [10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136309]
none
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
2
262
Article (author)
Periodico senza Impact Factor
P.G. Crosignani, P. Vercellini
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/199226
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact