RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors previously investigated the midsagittal magnetic resonance images of neurologically intact adults, and analyzed the shape of corpus callosum from a mathematic standpoint. Significant effects of age were demonstrated, without significant sex differences. In the current study, the same mathematic method was applied to analyze the sex and age shape differences of the human corpus callosum in childhood. METHODS: On the midsagittal magnetic resonance images of 84 neurologically intact children (39 boys, 45 girls, aged 4 months to 15 years) the outline of the corpus callosum was identified. Its shape was quantified using elliptic Fourier analysis, which allows for global evaluation of the shape of organs identified by their outlines independently from size, spatial orientation, and relationship to reference planes. Subjects were grouped by sex and age. RESULTS: The shape of the corpus callosum within age and sex classes in childhood was more homogeneous than in adulthood. A significant effect of age was demonstrated by the analysis of variance; however, no significant sex differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Corpus callosum shape in midsagittal magnetic resonance images was strongly influenced by central nervous system development and aging, but the influence of sex was not sufficient to be detected by current standard magnetic resonance imaging technology, and by the available sample sizes. The current investigation supplies data on the normal callosal shape in the first two decades of life, thus completing previous analysis

Shape of the human corpus callosum in childhood: elliptic Fourier analysis on midsagittal magnetic resonance scans / V.F. Ferrario, C. Sforza, G. Serrao, T. Frattini, C. Del Favero. - In: INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 0020-9996. - 31:1(1996), pp. 1230-1235. [10.1097/00004424-199601000-00001]

Shape of the human corpus callosum in childhood: elliptic Fourier analysis on midsagittal magnetic resonance scans

V.F. Ferrario;C. Sforza;G. Serrao;
1996

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors previously investigated the midsagittal magnetic resonance images of neurologically intact adults, and analyzed the shape of corpus callosum from a mathematic standpoint. Significant effects of age were demonstrated, without significant sex differences. In the current study, the same mathematic method was applied to analyze the sex and age shape differences of the human corpus callosum in childhood. METHODS: On the midsagittal magnetic resonance images of 84 neurologically intact children (39 boys, 45 girls, aged 4 months to 15 years) the outline of the corpus callosum was identified. Its shape was quantified using elliptic Fourier analysis, which allows for global evaluation of the shape of organs identified by their outlines independently from size, spatial orientation, and relationship to reference planes. Subjects were grouped by sex and age. RESULTS: The shape of the corpus callosum within age and sex classes in childhood was more homogeneous than in adulthood. A significant effect of age was demonstrated by the analysis of variance; however, no significant sex differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Corpus callosum shape in midsagittal magnetic resonance images was strongly influenced by central nervous system development and aging, but the influence of sex was not sufficient to be detected by current standard magnetic resonance imaging technology, and by the available sample sizes. The current investigation supplies data on the normal callosal shape in the first two decades of life, thus completing previous analysis
Corpus callosum; Fourier series; magnetic resonance; morphometry; shape analysis
Settore BIO/16 - Anatomia Umana
1996
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/175143
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact