OBJECTIVE: In this investigation, the precision of a commercial three-dimensional digitizer in the detection of facial landmarks in human adults was assessed. METHODS: Fifty landmarks were identified and marked on the faces of five men, on five women, and on a stone cast of the face of one man. For each subject, the three-dimensional coordinates of the landmarks were obtained twice using an electromagnetic three-dimensional digitizer, and the duplicate digitizations were superimposed using common orientations and centers of gravity. Metric differences between homologous landmarks were assessed, and Dahlberg's error was computed. RESULTS: For both men and women, the error was 1.05% of the nasion-midtragion distance, while for the cast, it was 0.9%. When the duplicate digitizations were used to mathematically reconstruct the faces, and several distances, angles, volumes, and surfaces were computed, more than 80% of the measurements had coefficients of variation lower than 1%. CONCLUSIONS: The digitizer can assess the coordinates of facial landmarks with sufficient precision, and reliable measurements can be obtained.

Preliminary evaluation of an electromagnetic three-dimensional digitizer in facial anthropometry / V.F. Ferrario, C. Sforza, C.E. Poggio, M. Cova, G. Tartaglia. - In: CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL. - ISSN 1055-6656. - 35:1(1998), pp. 9-15.

Preliminary evaluation of an electromagnetic three-dimensional digitizer in facial anthropometry

V.F. Ferrario
Primo
;
C. Sforza
Secondo
;
G. Tartaglia
Ultimo
1998

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this investigation, the precision of a commercial three-dimensional digitizer in the detection of facial landmarks in human adults was assessed. METHODS: Fifty landmarks were identified and marked on the faces of five men, on five women, and on a stone cast of the face of one man. For each subject, the three-dimensional coordinates of the landmarks were obtained twice using an electromagnetic three-dimensional digitizer, and the duplicate digitizations were superimposed using common orientations and centers of gravity. Metric differences between homologous landmarks were assessed, and Dahlberg's error was computed. RESULTS: For both men and women, the error was 1.05% of the nasion-midtragion distance, while for the cast, it was 0.9%. When the duplicate digitizations were used to mathematically reconstruct the faces, and several distances, angles, volumes, and surfaces were computed, more than 80% of the measurements had coefficients of variation lower than 1%. CONCLUSIONS: The digitizer can assess the coordinates of facial landmarks with sufficient precision, and reliable measurements can be obtained.
Settore BIO/16 - Anatomia Umana
1998
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/175113
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 91
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 80
social impact