The relationship between past contraceptive method use and risk of ectopic pregnancy has been analyzed in a case-control study conducted in Milan, Italy. Cases were 158 women with diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy confirmed by laparoscopy or laparotomy, admitted to a network of university and general hospitals of Milan. The first control group (obstetric controls) included 243 women who gave birth at term (more than 37 weeks' gestation) to healthy infants at the same hospitals where the cases had been identified. The second control group (non-obstetric controls) was a random sample of 158 women admitted to the same network of hospitals where cases had been identified for diseases other than malignant, hormonal, or gynecological in origin. A total of 37 (23%) cases, 21 (9%) obstetric and 24 (15%) non-obstetric controls reported ever IUD use. The corresponding relative risk, RR, of ectopic pregnancy was 3.5 (95% CI 1.3-4.6) when non-obstetric subjects were considered as control group. The risk of ectopic pregnancy increased with duration of IUD use: in comparison with obstetric and non-obstetric controls, the RR were 2.3 and 2.0 for users for less than 2 years and 4.3 and 2.6 for longer users. There was no clear relation between time since last IUD use and risk of ectopic pregnancy, and no evidence of a decline of risk with increasing time since stopping use.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Past contraceptive method use and risk of ectopic pregnancy / F. Parazzini, M. Ferraroni, L. Tozzi, G. Benzi, G. Rossi, C. La Vecchia. - In: CONTRACEPTION. - ISSN 0010-7824. - 52:2(1995 Aug), pp. 93-98.

Past contraceptive method use and risk of ectopic pregnancy

F. Parazzini
Primo
;
M. Ferraroni
Secondo
;
C. La Vecchia
Ultimo
1995

Abstract

The relationship between past contraceptive method use and risk of ectopic pregnancy has been analyzed in a case-control study conducted in Milan, Italy. Cases were 158 women with diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy confirmed by laparoscopy or laparotomy, admitted to a network of university and general hospitals of Milan. The first control group (obstetric controls) included 243 women who gave birth at term (more than 37 weeks' gestation) to healthy infants at the same hospitals where the cases had been identified. The second control group (non-obstetric controls) was a random sample of 158 women admitted to the same network of hospitals where cases had been identified for diseases other than malignant, hormonal, or gynecological in origin. A total of 37 (23%) cases, 21 (9%) obstetric and 24 (15%) non-obstetric controls reported ever IUD use. The corresponding relative risk, RR, of ectopic pregnancy was 3.5 (95% CI 1.3-4.6) when non-obstetric subjects were considered as control group. The risk of ectopic pregnancy increased with duration of IUD use: in comparison with obstetric and non-obstetric controls, the RR were 2.3 and 2.0 for users for less than 2 years and 4.3 and 2.6 for longer users. There was no clear relation between time since last IUD use and risk of ectopic pregnancy, and no evidence of a decline of risk with increasing time since stopping use.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Iud ; Pregnancy Complications ; Barrier Methods ; Laparoscopy ; Research Methodology ; Humans ; Oral Contraceptives ; Contraceptive Methods ; Europe ; Developed Countries ; Italy ; Southern Europe ; Adult ; Diseases ; Family Planning ; Adolescent ; Time Factors ; Pregnancy, Ectopic ; Research Report ; Studies ; Pregnancy ; Case Control Studies ; Contraception ; Mediterranean Countries ; Intrauterine Devices ; Risk Factors ; Case-Control Studies ; Contraceptive Usage ; Female ; Biology
Settore MED/40 - Ginecologia e Ostetricia
Settore MED/01 - Statistica Medica
ago-1995
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/172745
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact