BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcome after aortic valve replacement with the Bravo Cardiovascular Model 400 stentless xenograft. METHODS: Between February 1992 and January 1994, 67 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with the Bravo 400 bioprosthesis. The valvular pathology was aortic stenosis in 36 patients (53.7%), aortic insufficiency in 17 patients (25.4%), and mixed lesion in 14 patients (20.9%). Mean follow-up time was 9.8 +/- 2.73 years and median follow-up time was 11 years. Cumulative follow-up time was 659 patients-years and was 94% complete. RESULTS: No early deaths were observed. Overall survival estimates at 11 years were 74.71% +/- 5.47%. The actuarial freedom from valve-related death at 11 years was 91.04% +/- 3.84%; from cardiac-related death at 11 years it was 87.95% +/- 4.29%; and from noncardiac death at 11 years it was 85.14% +/- 4.58%. Eleven-year Kaplan-Meier survival of patients younger than 65 years was 90.91% +/- 6.13% versus 66.08% +/- 7.38% for older patients (p = 0.0307, log-rank test). The actuarial freedom from all valve-related morbidity and mortality at 11 years was 80.3% +/- 5.4%. The mean transvalvular gradient decreased significantly after aortic valve replacement with a corresponding increase in effective orifice area. Left ventricular mass index at 10-year follow-up was 68.5% of the preoperative value. CONCLUSIONS: The Bravo Cardiovascular Model 400 stentless xenograft has provided good clinical and hemodynamic results up until 11 years of follow-up.

Long-term results after aortic valve replacement with the Bravo 400 stentless xenograft / G. Polvani, F. Barili, L. Dainese, M. Muratori, M. Porqueddu, A. Sala, P. Biglioli. - In: ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY. - ISSN 0003-4975. - 80:2(2005 Aug), pp. 495-501. [10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.033]

Long-term results after aortic valve replacement with the Bravo 400 stentless xenograft

G. Polvani;F. Barili;P. Biglioli
2005

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcome after aortic valve replacement with the Bravo Cardiovascular Model 400 stentless xenograft. METHODS: Between February 1992 and January 1994, 67 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with the Bravo 400 bioprosthesis. The valvular pathology was aortic stenosis in 36 patients (53.7%), aortic insufficiency in 17 patients (25.4%), and mixed lesion in 14 patients (20.9%). Mean follow-up time was 9.8 +/- 2.73 years and median follow-up time was 11 years. Cumulative follow-up time was 659 patients-years and was 94% complete. RESULTS: No early deaths were observed. Overall survival estimates at 11 years were 74.71% +/- 5.47%. The actuarial freedom from valve-related death at 11 years was 91.04% +/- 3.84%; from cardiac-related death at 11 years it was 87.95% +/- 4.29%; and from noncardiac death at 11 years it was 85.14% +/- 4.58%. Eleven-year Kaplan-Meier survival of patients younger than 65 years was 90.91% +/- 6.13% versus 66.08% +/- 7.38% for older patients (p = 0.0307, log-rank test). The actuarial freedom from all valve-related morbidity and mortality at 11 years was 80.3% +/- 5.4%. The mean transvalvular gradient decreased significantly after aortic valve replacement with a corresponding increase in effective orifice area. Left ventricular mass index at 10-year follow-up was 68.5% of the preoperative value. CONCLUSIONS: The Bravo Cardiovascular Model 400 stentless xenograft has provided good clinical and hemodynamic results up until 11 years of follow-up.
Settore MED/23 - Chirurgia Cardiaca
ago-2005
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
polvani.pdf

accesso solo dalla rete interna

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 172.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
172.45 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/17050
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact