The thesis investigates the unlawful compulsory easements of land issued by Italian public bodies for public use against the statutory provisions of the Statute Concerning the Law and Regulation of Compulsory Purchase for Public Use (Testo unico delle disposizioni legislative e regolamentari in materia di espropriazione per pubblica utilità, d.P.R. 8 giugno 2001, n. 327). In particular the thesis aims at offering an interpretation of the provision set forth in Art. 43 of said statute, which regulates the “Easement for use for the public interest” (“Utilizzazione senza titolo di un bene per scopi di interesse pubblico”). The first chapter is devoted to reconstructing the history and evolution of the legal discipline of compulsive easements and tries to single out the reasons that led to its development. The second chapter analyzes the Italian Constitutional Court and European Court of Human Rights case law in the subject matter. The third chapter offers a critical review of the case law concerning the enforcement of Art. 43. In the fourth chapter I offer a comprehensive interpretation of the statutory provision, with the aim of harmonizing it with the whole legal system, and in particular with the principle of legality and with the principle of ‘just equilibrium’. Finally, the fifth chapter is devoted to the analysis of Ruling n. 293/2010, in which the Italian Constitutional Court held that Art. 43 was unconstitutional because it violated art. 76 of the Italian Constitution. The interpretation of Art. 43 offered in the thesis is based on the need to harmonize its provision with the whole system and therefore to the principle of legality and the principle of proportionality. This was done by reference to the law regulating compulsory purchases set forth in the same statute, which is held to correctly enact said principles. As a result of this interpretation, the scope of the regulation set forth in art. 43, concerning compulsory easement, has been harmonized with said regulation and therefore limited to a much narrower set of cases - with respect to both subject matter and time limits - compared to those which would result admissible under alternative interpretations. According to this interpretation compulsory easement is not conceived as a public power alternative to compulsory purchases, but as part of the same power of expropriation exercised under different forms, in accordance to the evolution of the ordinary procedure into a special one.

IL POTERE DI ACQUISIZIONE SUCCESSIVA NEL DIRITTO DELLA ESPROPRIAZIONE PER PUBBLICA UTILITÀ TRA PRINCIPIO DI LEGALITÀ E 'GIUSTO EQUILIBRIO' / A.c.g. Sergi ; tutor: Riccardo Villata ; coordinatore: Erminio Ferrari. DIPARTIMENTO DI DIRITTO PUBBLICO, PROCESSUALE CIVILE , INTERNAZIONALE ED EUROPEO, 2011 Feb 04. 22. ciclo, Anno Accademico 2009. [10.13130/sergi-alberto-carmelo-giuseppe_phd2011-02-04].

IL POTERE DI ACQUISIZIONE SUCCESSIVA NEL DIRITTO DELLA ESPROPRIAZIONE PER PUBBLICA UTILITÀ TRA PRINCIPIO DI LEGALITÀ E 'GIUSTO EQUILIBRIO'

A.C.G. Sergi
2011

Abstract

The thesis investigates the unlawful compulsory easements of land issued by Italian public bodies for public use against the statutory provisions of the Statute Concerning the Law and Regulation of Compulsory Purchase for Public Use (Testo unico delle disposizioni legislative e regolamentari in materia di espropriazione per pubblica utilità, d.P.R. 8 giugno 2001, n. 327). In particular the thesis aims at offering an interpretation of the provision set forth in Art. 43 of said statute, which regulates the “Easement for use for the public interest” (“Utilizzazione senza titolo di un bene per scopi di interesse pubblico”). The first chapter is devoted to reconstructing the history and evolution of the legal discipline of compulsive easements and tries to single out the reasons that led to its development. The second chapter analyzes the Italian Constitutional Court and European Court of Human Rights case law in the subject matter. The third chapter offers a critical review of the case law concerning the enforcement of Art. 43. In the fourth chapter I offer a comprehensive interpretation of the statutory provision, with the aim of harmonizing it with the whole legal system, and in particular with the principle of legality and with the principle of ‘just equilibrium’. Finally, the fifth chapter is devoted to the analysis of Ruling n. 293/2010, in which the Italian Constitutional Court held that Art. 43 was unconstitutional because it violated art. 76 of the Italian Constitution. The interpretation of Art. 43 offered in the thesis is based on the need to harmonize its provision with the whole system and therefore to the principle of legality and the principle of proportionality. This was done by reference to the law regulating compulsory purchases set forth in the same statute, which is held to correctly enact said principles. As a result of this interpretation, the scope of the regulation set forth in art. 43, concerning compulsory easement, has been harmonized with said regulation and therefore limited to a much narrower set of cases - with respect to both subject matter and time limits - compared to those which would result admissible under alternative interpretations. According to this interpretation compulsory easement is not conceived as a public power alternative to compulsory purchases, but as part of the same power of expropriation exercised under different forms, in accordance to the evolution of the ordinary procedure into a special one.
4-feb-2011
Settore IUS/10 - Diritto Amministrativo
VILLATA, RICCARDO
FERRARI, ERMINIO
Doctoral Thesis
IL POTERE DI ACQUISIZIONE SUCCESSIVA NEL DIRITTO DELLA ESPROPRIAZIONE PER PUBBLICA UTILITÀ TRA PRINCIPIO DI LEGALITÀ E 'GIUSTO EQUILIBRIO' / A.c.g. Sergi ; tutor: Riccardo Villata ; coordinatore: Erminio Ferrari. DIPARTIMENTO DI DIRITTO PUBBLICO, PROCESSUALE CIVILE , INTERNAZIONALE ED EUROPEO, 2011 Feb 04. 22. ciclo, Anno Accademico 2009. [10.13130/sergi-alberto-carmelo-giuseppe_phd2011-02-04].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
phd_unimi_R06949.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Tesi di dottorato completa
Dimensione 2.34 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.34 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/153101
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact