the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 11, 264–274 (2010))1, Giacomo Rizzolatti and I were aiming to highlight the functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror network in understanding the actions and intentions of others. Leonhard Schilbach has recently argued (A second-person approach to other minds. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 20 May 2010 (doi: 10.1038/nrn2805-c1))2 that, although “well balanced”, the Review does not take into account the enactive approach to social cognition and so overlooks the fundamental difference between being directly engaged in interaction with someone else (that is, having a second-person perspective) and merely observing others (assuming a third-person perspective). In this reply I argue that Schildbach''s criticism is misleading to characterize the mirror-based action and intention understanding as a pure third-person grasp of other individuals’ mental states that is performed in a mere observational — that is, detached — stance, as it fails to appreciate the full implications of the discovery of the mirror system.

Mirroring and making sense of others / C. Sinigaglia. - In: NATURE REVIEWS. NEUROSCIENCE. - ISSN 1471-003X. - 11:6(2010), pp. 449-449. [10.1038/nrn2805-c2]

Mirroring and making sense of others

C. Sinigaglia
Primo
2010

Abstract

the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 11, 264–274 (2010))1, Giacomo Rizzolatti and I were aiming to highlight the functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror network in understanding the actions and intentions of others. Leonhard Schilbach has recently argued (A second-person approach to other minds. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 20 May 2010 (doi: 10.1038/nrn2805-c1))2 that, although “well balanced”, the Review does not take into account the enactive approach to social cognition and so overlooks the fundamental difference between being directly engaged in interaction with someone else (that is, having a second-person perspective) and merely observing others (assuming a third-person perspective). In this reply I argue that Schildbach''s criticism is misleading to characterize the mirror-based action and intention understanding as a pure third-person grasp of other individuals’ mental states that is performed in a mere observational — that is, detached — stance, as it fails to appreciate the full implications of the discovery of the mirror system.
Settore M-FIL/02 - Logica e Filosofia della Scienza
2010
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
sinigaglia2010nrn.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 65.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
65.04 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/147585
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact