PURPOSE: A validated disease severity scoring system (DS3) for Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) is needed to standardize patient monitoring and to define patient cohorts in clinical studies. METHODS: DS3 domains were established by an expert physician group using the nominal group technique of consensus formation. Items were selected by 36 GD1 physicians. The expert group determined appropriate measurement techniques for each item. Measurements were weighted considering contributions to GD1 morbidity and mortality. Consensus Clinical Global Impression Severity scores for sample cases were compared with average DS3 scores. A minimal clinically important difference in GD1 DS3 score was calculated. RESULTS: The GD1 DS3 includes bone (42% of score), hematologic (32%), and visceral domains (26%); individual items use routine assessments, including medical history, blood chemistry, organ volume measurements, and bone evaluations (magnetic resonance imaging and dual X-ray absorptiometry). The maximum score is 19. Interrater reliability was 0.97 (Cohen's kappa). DS3 scores were highly correlated with Clinical Global Impression Severity scores (r = 0.89). The minimal clinically important difference was-3.2 improvement and +3.9 deterioration. CONCLUSION: This DS3 accurately quantifies GD1 status and intrapatient change over time. Testing of reliability and validity will continue to allow eventual implementation of the DS3 in clinical studies and routine practice.

A validated disease severity scoring system for adults with type 1 Gaucher disease / N. J. Weinreb, M. D. Cappellini, T. M. Cox, E. H. Giannini, G. A. Grabowski, W. L. Hwu, H. Mankin, A. M. Martins, C. Sawyer, S. vom Dahl, M. S. Yeh, A. Zimran. - In: GENETICS IN MEDICINE. - ISSN 1098-3600. - 12:1(2010 Jan), pp. 44-51. [10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181c39194]

A validated disease severity scoring system for adults with type 1 Gaucher disease

M. D. Cappellini
Secondo
;
2010-01

Abstract

PURPOSE: A validated disease severity scoring system (DS3) for Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) is needed to standardize patient monitoring and to define patient cohorts in clinical studies. METHODS: DS3 domains were established by an expert physician group using the nominal group technique of consensus formation. Items were selected by 36 GD1 physicians. The expert group determined appropriate measurement techniques for each item. Measurements were weighted considering contributions to GD1 morbidity and mortality. Consensus Clinical Global Impression Severity scores for sample cases were compared with average DS3 scores. A minimal clinically important difference in GD1 DS3 score was calculated. RESULTS: The GD1 DS3 includes bone (42% of score), hematologic (32%), and visceral domains (26%); individual items use routine assessments, including medical history, blood chemistry, organ volume measurements, and bone evaluations (magnetic resonance imaging and dual X-ray absorptiometry). The maximum score is 19. Interrater reliability was 0.97 (Cohen's kappa). DS3 scores were highly correlated with Clinical Global Impression Severity scores (r = 0.89). The minimal clinically important difference was-3.2 improvement and +3.9 deterioration. CONCLUSION: This DS3 accurately quantifies GD1 status and intrapatient change over time. Testing of reliability and validity will continue to allow eventual implementation of the DS3 in clinical studies and routine practice.
Settore MED/09 - Medicina Interna
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2434/147446
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 22
  • Scopus 46
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 47
social impact