Due to their natural host-range restriction to avian species, canarypox virus (CP) and fowlpox virus (FP) represent efficient and safe vaccine vectors, as they correctly express transgenes in human cells, elicit complete immune responses, show protective efficacy in preclinical animal models. At present, no information is available on the differences in the abortive replication of these two avipox viruses in mammalian cells. In the present study, the replicative cycles of CP and FP, wild-type and recombinants, are compared in permissive and non-permissive cells, using transmission electron microscopy. We demonstrated that in non-permissive cells the replicative cycle is more advanced in FP rather than CP, that human cells, whether immune or not, are less permissive to avipox replication than monkey cells, and that the presence of virus-like particles only occurs after FP infection. Overall, these data suggest the use of FP recombinants as more appropriate than CP to elicit a better immune response.

Canarypox and fowlpox viruses as recombinant vaccine vectors: an ultrastructural comparative analysis / S.M. Pacchioni, L. Volonté, C. Zanotto, E.M. Pozzi, C. De Giuli Morghen, A. Radaelli. - In: ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY. - ISSN 0304-8608. - 155:6(2010), pp. 915-924. [10.1007/s00705-010-0663-7]

Canarypox and fowlpox viruses as recombinant vaccine vectors: an ultrastructural comparative analysis

S.M. Pacchioni;C. Zanotto;E.M. Pozzi;C. De Giuli Morghen
Penultimo
;
A. Radaelli
2010

Abstract

Due to their natural host-range restriction to avian species, canarypox virus (CP) and fowlpox virus (FP) represent efficient and safe vaccine vectors, as they correctly express transgenes in human cells, elicit complete immune responses, show protective efficacy in preclinical animal models. At present, no information is available on the differences in the abortive replication of these two avipox viruses in mammalian cells. In the present study, the replicative cycles of CP and FP, wild-type and recombinants, are compared in permissive and non-permissive cells, using transmission electron microscopy. We demonstrated that in non-permissive cells the replicative cycle is more advanced in FP rather than CP, that human cells, whether immune or not, are less permissive to avipox replication than monkey cells, and that the presence of virus-like particles only occurs after FP infection. Overall, these data suggest the use of FP recombinants as more appropriate than CP to elicit a better immune response.
canarypox virus ; fowlpox virus ; recombinant vaccines ; electron microscopy
Settore BIO/19 - Microbiologia Generale
2010
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/144890
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact