Background: Tamoxifen's cost-benefit ratio for breast ductal intraepithelial neoplasia (DIN) is unclear. Since low-dose tamoxifen showed a favorable modulation of breast cancer biomarkers in phase II trials, a monoinstitutional cohort of women with DIN treated with low-dose tamoxifen or no systemic treatment was analyzed. Patients and methods: A total of 309 patients with DIN received low-dose tamoxifen as part of institutional guidelines and were compared with 371 patients with DIN who received no systemic treatment after surgery. Results: Women with estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PgR) >50% DIN who were not treated had a higher incidence of breast events than women on tamoxifen [hazard ratio (HR) 1.76; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-3.12] or women with ER/PgR <50% DIN (HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.14-2.58). Among untreated patients with ER >50% DIN, recurrence was higher in PgR ≥50% DIN than in PgR <50% DIN, whereas it was similar among low PgR (<50%) DIN against which tamoxifen had no effect. No difference in endometrial cancer incidence was noted. Conclusions: High ER and especially high PgR expression is a significant adverse prognostic indicator of DIN, and low-dose tamoxifen appears to be an active treatment. Women with low-expression ER or PgR DIN do not seem to benefit from tamoxifen. A definitive clinical trial is warranted.
Low-dose tamoxifen in the treatment of breast ductal intraepithelial neoplasia: results of a large observational study / A. Guerrieri-Gonzaga, E. Botteri, M. Lazzeroni, N. Rotmensz, A. Goldhirsch, C. Varricchio, D. Serrano, M. Cazzaniga, F. Bassi, A. Luini, V. Bagnardi, G. Viale, S. Mora, G. Bollani, E. Albertazzi, B. Bonanni, A. Decensi. - In: ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0923-7534. - 21:5(2010), pp. 949-954. [10.1093/annonc/mdp408]
Low-dose tamoxifen in the treatment of breast ductal intraepithelial neoplasia: results of a large observational study
G. Viale;
2010
Abstract
Background: Tamoxifen's cost-benefit ratio for breast ductal intraepithelial neoplasia (DIN) is unclear. Since low-dose tamoxifen showed a favorable modulation of breast cancer biomarkers in phase II trials, a monoinstitutional cohort of women with DIN treated with low-dose tamoxifen or no systemic treatment was analyzed. Patients and methods: A total of 309 patients with DIN received low-dose tamoxifen as part of institutional guidelines and were compared with 371 patients with DIN who received no systemic treatment after surgery. Results: Women with estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PgR) >50% DIN who were not treated had a higher incidence of breast events than women on tamoxifen [hazard ratio (HR) 1.76; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-3.12] or women with ER/PgR <50% DIN (HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.14-2.58). Among untreated patients with ER >50% DIN, recurrence was higher in PgR ≥50% DIN than in PgR <50% DIN, whereas it was similar among low PgR (<50%) DIN against which tamoxifen had no effect. No difference in endometrial cancer incidence was noted. Conclusions: High ER and especially high PgR expression is a significant adverse prognostic indicator of DIN, and low-dose tamoxifen appears to be an active treatment. Women with low-expression ER or PgR DIN do not seem to benefit from tamoxifen. A definitive clinical trial is warranted.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.