The aim of this study was to evaluate stress patterns at the bone-implant interface of tilted versus nontilted implant configurations in edentulous maxillae using finite element models of two tilted and one nontilted configuration. Analysis predicted the maximum absolute value of principal compressive stress near the cervical area of the distal implant for all models. The tilted configurations showed a lower absolute value of compressive stress compared with the nontilted, indicating a possible biomechanical advantage in reducing stresses at the bone-implant interface.

A finite element analysis of tilted versus nontilted implant configurations in the edentulous maxilla / C.M. Bellini, D. Romeo, F. Galbusera, E. Agliardi, R. Pietrabissa, A. Zampelis, L.A. Francetti. - In: THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS. - ISSN 0893-2174. - 22:2(2009 Mar), pp. 155-157.

A finite element analysis of tilted versus nontilted implant configurations in the edentulous maxilla

D. Romeo
Secondo
;
E. Agliardi;L.A. Francetti
Ultimo
2009

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate stress patterns at the bone-implant interface of tilted versus nontilted implant configurations in edentulous maxillae using finite element models of two tilted and one nontilted configuration. Analysis predicted the maximum absolute value of principal compressive stress near the cervical area of the distal implant for all models. The tilted configurations showed a lower absolute value of compressive stress compared with the nontilted, indicating a possible biomechanical advantage in reducing stresses at the bone-implant interface.
Settore MED/28 - Malattie Odontostomatologiche
mar-2009
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/143060
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 63
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 57
social impact