AIM: The evident rise in the number of neurosurgical malpractice and the apparent lack of adequate training in neurosurgery patient management are discussed. However, alongside neurosurgeons, neurosurgical malpractice claims involve also physicians from primary to specialist care, particularly those attending neurosurgical patients in emergency rooms. Some pathologies and disputed treatments are described. METHODS: The case series includes 138 medical malpractice lawsuits examined over a 10-year period (1992-2002). The pathologies for which disputed treatment led to malpractice lawsuit as well as their frequency are presented. RESULTS: Of the total 138 lawsuits examined, 38 did not involve professional health care workers, whereas the remaining 100 cases involved: neurosurgeons (48 cases); other specialist or primary physicians (51 cases); nursing staff (1 case). These malpractice lawsuits and the relevant pathologies are examined in detail. CONCLUSION: On the basis of personal experience, some considerations and recommendations are suggested for the clinical practice.

Neurosurgery in the law court / A. De Santis. - In: JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 0390-5616. - 48:3(2004), pp. 97-103.

Neurosurgery in the law court

A. De Santis
Primo
2004

Abstract

AIM: The evident rise in the number of neurosurgical malpractice and the apparent lack of adequate training in neurosurgery patient management are discussed. However, alongside neurosurgeons, neurosurgical malpractice claims involve also physicians from primary to specialist care, particularly those attending neurosurgical patients in emergency rooms. Some pathologies and disputed treatments are described. METHODS: The case series includes 138 medical malpractice lawsuits examined over a 10-year period (1992-2002). The pathologies for which disputed treatment led to malpractice lawsuit as well as their frequency are presented. RESULTS: Of the total 138 lawsuits examined, 38 did not involve professional health care workers, whereas the remaining 100 cases involved: neurosurgeons (48 cases); other specialist or primary physicians (51 cases); nursing staff (1 case). These malpractice lawsuits and the relevant pathologies are examined in detail. CONCLUSION: On the basis of personal experience, some considerations and recommendations are suggested for the clinical practice.
Jurisprudence; Law; Neurosurgery
Settore MED/27 - Neurochirurgia
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2434/140957
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact