This article re-examines the Milanese monetary controversy of 1762 through Pietro Verri’s Collezione Eroicomica, a largely unpublished collection assembled in 1764. It argues that the dispute concerned less a clash between separate monetary doctrines than different ways of ordering and assigning epistemic status to a partly shared repertoire of monetary reasoning. Carpani embedded proportional relations within a broader field of prudential, commercial, legal, and institutional considerations; the Pugni increasingly treated proportional relations as objective features of monetary order and general principles as privileged criteria against which legislation and political judgment should be assessed. Satire sharpened this asymmetry by recasting rival premises as arbitrary, confused, or intellectually inadequate. Read relationally, the Collezione reveals satire as an epistemic device through which analytical innovation and polemical delegitimation jointly constructed economic authority by redistributing credibility and the burden of justification.

Satire as an Epistemic Device: The Collezione Eroicomica and the Construction of Economic Authority in the Milanese Monetary Controversy of 1762 / G. Brunazzi, M.F.. - (2026 Oct 12). (19. Conferenza AISPE Firenze 2026) [10.2139/ssrn.7599940].

Satire as an Epistemic Device: The Collezione Eroicomica and the Construction of Economic Authority in the Milanese Monetary Controversy of 1762

G. Brunazzi
Primo
;
2026

Abstract

This article re-examines the Milanese monetary controversy of 1762 through Pietro Verri’s Collezione Eroicomica, a largely unpublished collection assembled in 1764. It argues that the dispute concerned less a clash between separate monetary doctrines than different ways of ordering and assigning epistemic status to a partly shared repertoire of monetary reasoning. Carpani embedded proportional relations within a broader field of prudential, commercial, legal, and institutional considerations; the Pugni increasingly treated proportional relations as objective features of monetary order and general principles as privileged criteria against which legislation and political judgment should be assessed. Satire sharpened this asymmetry by recasting rival premises as arbitrary, confused, or intellectually inadequate. Read relationally, the Collezione reveals satire as an epistemic device through which analytical innovation and polemical delegitimation jointly constructed economic authority by redistributing credibility and the burden of justification.
History of economic thought; Epistemic authority; Satire; Monetary controversy; Accademia dei Pugni; Collezione Eroicomica
Settore STEC-01/A - Storia del pensiero economico
Settore STEC-01/B - Storia economica
12-ott-2026
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7599940
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ssrn-7599940.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 297.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
297.73 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1275017
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact