Background: Mowat–Wilson syndrome (MWS) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by intellectual disability, distinctive craniofacial features, behavioral impairments, and congenital anomalies. Although oral and craniofacial abnormalities are frequently reported, their impact on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) has not been investigated. This study aimed to evaluate OHRQoL in children with MWS and compare it with peers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and neurotypical controls. Secondary analyses explored caregiver functional limitations and dental care characteristics.Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted involving caregivers of children aged 6–18 years with MWS (n = 19), ASD (n = 19), and neurotypical controls (n = 38). OHRQoL was assessed using the short-form Parental-Caregiver Perception Questionnaire (P-CPQ) and Family Impact Scale (FIS). Additional questions explored socioeconomic characteristics, dental care setting and attendance, and parental perceptions of oral health. Group comparisons were performed using non-parametric and parametric tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.Results: Children with MWS showed significantly higher total P-CPQ scores than neurotypical controls (37.11 ± 8.65 vs. 26.23 ± 5.05; p < 0.001), indicating poorer OHRQoL. The greatest impairments were observed in the functional limitation domain, particularly regarding chewing difficulties, mouth breathing, slower eating, and sleep disturbances (all p < 0.001). Halitosis and food impaction on the palate were also significantly more frequent in the MWS group. Parents of children with MWS reported a greater impact of oral conditions on wellbeing than both ASD and neurotypical groups (p < 0.05). Although OHRQoL impairment was comparable between MWS and ASD participants, ASD was associated with greater family burden, reflected by higher FIS scores (16.42 ± 7.09 vs. 21.58 ± 4.85; p = 0.016). Both MWS and ASD groups exhibited higher combined P-CPQ + FIS scores than neurotypical controls (p < 0.01).Conclusions: Both MWS and ASD were associated with poorer OHRQoL than neurotypical status, although distinct patterns of impairment emerged. MWS was primarily characterized by functional oral limitations and a greater impact of oral conditions on wellbeing, whereas ASD was associated with greater psychosocial and family burden. These findings support the existence of a syndrome-specific profile of caregiver-perceived unmet oral health needs and functional limitations in children with complex healthcare conditions and emphasize the importance of individualized, multidisciplinary dental care strategies.
Caregiver-reported oral health-related quality of life in children with Mowat–Wilson syndrome: a comparative study / S. Cirio, C.S.. - In: FRONTIERS IN DENTAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2673-4915. - 7:(2026 Oct 09), pp. 1-13. [10.3389/fdmed.2026.1953280]
Caregiver-reported oral health-related quality of life in children with Mowat–Wilson syndrome: a comparative study
S. CirioPrimo
;C. SalernoSecondo
;A. Allam
;G. Zambon;A. BalianPenultimo
;M.G. CagettiUltimo
2026
Abstract
Background: Mowat–Wilson syndrome (MWS) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by intellectual disability, distinctive craniofacial features, behavioral impairments, and congenital anomalies. Although oral and craniofacial abnormalities are frequently reported, their impact on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) has not been investigated. This study aimed to evaluate OHRQoL in children with MWS and compare it with peers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and neurotypical controls. Secondary analyses explored caregiver functional limitations and dental care characteristics.Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted involving caregivers of children aged 6–18 years with MWS (n = 19), ASD (n = 19), and neurotypical controls (n = 38). OHRQoL was assessed using the short-form Parental-Caregiver Perception Questionnaire (P-CPQ) and Family Impact Scale (FIS). Additional questions explored socioeconomic characteristics, dental care setting and attendance, and parental perceptions of oral health. Group comparisons were performed using non-parametric and parametric tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.Results: Children with MWS showed significantly higher total P-CPQ scores than neurotypical controls (37.11 ± 8.65 vs. 26.23 ± 5.05; p < 0.001), indicating poorer OHRQoL. The greatest impairments were observed in the functional limitation domain, particularly regarding chewing difficulties, mouth breathing, slower eating, and sleep disturbances (all p < 0.001). Halitosis and food impaction on the palate were also significantly more frequent in the MWS group. Parents of children with MWS reported a greater impact of oral conditions on wellbeing than both ASD and neurotypical groups (p < 0.05). Although OHRQoL impairment was comparable between MWS and ASD participants, ASD was associated with greater family burden, reflected by higher FIS scores (16.42 ± 7.09 vs. 21.58 ± 4.85; p = 0.016). Both MWS and ASD groups exhibited higher combined P-CPQ + FIS scores than neurotypical controls (p < 0.01).Conclusions: Both MWS and ASD were associated with poorer OHRQoL than neurotypical status, although distinct patterns of impairment emerged. MWS was primarily characterized by functional oral limitations and a greater impact of oral conditions on wellbeing, whereas ASD was associated with greater psychosocial and family burden. These findings support the existence of a syndrome-specific profile of caregiver-perceived unmet oral health needs and functional limitations in children with complex healthcare conditions and emphasize the importance of individualized, multidisciplinary dental care strategies.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Frontiers Dent Med Mowat.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
413.29 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
413.29 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




